Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 93

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conserved transcriptomic profiles underpin monogamy across vertebrates

Young, Rebecca L., Ferkin, Michael H., Ockendon-Powell, Nina F., Orr, Veronica N., Phelps, Steven M., Pogány, Ákos, Richards-Zawacki, Corinne L., Summers, Kyle, Székely, Tamás, Trainor, Brian C., Urrutia, Araxi O., Zachar, Gergely, O’Connell, Lauren A., Hofmann, Hans A.·2019·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Social monogamy, typically characterized by the formation of a pair bond, increased territorial defense, and often biparental care, has independently evolved multiple times in animals. Despite the independent evolutionary origins of monogamous mating systems, several homologous brain regions and neuropeptides and their receptors have been shown to play a conserved role in regulating social affiliation and parental care, but little is known about the neuromolecular mechanisms underlying monogamy on a genomic scale. Here, we compare neural transcriptomes of reproductive males in monogamous and nonmonogamous species pairs of Peromyscus mice, Microtus voles, parid songbirds, dendrobatid frogs, and Xenotilapia species of cichlid fishes. We find that, while evolutionary divergence time between species or clades did not explain gene expression similarity, characteristics of the mating system correlated with neural gene expression patterns, and neural gene expression varied concordantly across vertebrates when species transition to monogamy. Our study provides evidence of a universal transcriptomic mechanism underlying the evolution of monogamy in vertebrates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1813775116

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. R Trivers, Parental investment and sexual selection. Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, ed B Campbell (Aldine, Chicago), pp. 136–179 (1972).
  2. RL Young Data from “Conserved transcriptomic profiles underpin monogamy across vertebrates.” Gene Expression Omnibus. Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE123301. Deposited December 3 2018. (2018).

Cited by

See all 93

Metadata

Authors
Young, R. L., Ferkin, M. H., Ockendon-Powell, N. F., Orr, V. N., Phelps, S. M., Pogány, Á., Richards-Zawacki, C. L., Summers, K., Székely, T., Trainor, B. C., Urrutia, A. O., Zachar, G., O’Connell, L. A., & Hofmann, H. A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712;
  • Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38111;
  • Life Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, United Kingdom;
  • Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616;
  • Department of Ethology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest H-1117, Hungary;
  • Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260;
  • Department of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858;
  • Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom;
  • Department of Anatomy, Histology, and Embryology, Semmelweis University, Budapest H-1094, Hungary;
  • Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2019-01-07
Volume
116
Issue
4
Pages
1331-1336
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
93
References
47
Language
en
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (IOS-1354942, IOS-1501704, IOS-1601734)
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (BR-4900)
  • HHS | National Institutes of Health (MH85069-S2)
  • Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA K109337)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.