Cited by 27Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAnimal Vocal Communication and BehaviorNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

D2 dopamine receptor activation induces female preference for male song in the monogamous zebra finch

Day, Nancy F., Saxon, David, Robbins, Anastasia, Harris, Lily, Nee, Emily, Shroff-Mehta, Naomi, Stout, Kaeley, Sun, Julia +4 more·2019·Journal of Experimental Biology

Abstract

The evolutionary conservation of neural mechanisms for forming and maintaining pair bonds is unclear. Oxytocin, vasopressin and dopamine (DA) transmitter systems have been shown to be important in pair-bond formation and maintenance in several vertebrate species. We examined the role of dopamine in formation of song preference in zebra finches, a monogamous bird. Male courtship song is an honest signal of sexual fitness; thus, we measured female song preference to evaluate the role of DA in mate selection and pair-bond formation, using an operant conditioning paradigm. We found that DA acting through the D2 receptor, but not the D1 receptor, can induce a song preference in unpaired female finches and that blocking the D2 receptor abolished song preference in paired females. These results suggest that similar neural mechanisms for pair-bond formation are evolutionarily conserved in rodents and birds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jeb.191510

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Collectively, studies in zebra finches, butterflyfishes, and other species emphasize the significance of the interplay between OXT and DA and their combined impact on pair bonding, extending beyond the context of humans and rodents.

    “Collectively, these studies (Anderson et al., 2023; Day et al., 2019; Nowicki et al., 2020) emphasize the significance of the interplay between OXT and DA and their combined impact on pair bonding, extending beyond the context of humans and rodents.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Day, N. F., Saxon, D., Robbins, A., Harris, L., Nee, E., Shroff-Mehta, N., Stout, K., Sun, J., Lillie, N., Burns, M., Korn, C., & Coleman, M. J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Claremont McKenna College (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
2019-03-01
Volume
222
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9145
OpenAlex
W2921563953
Cited by
27
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (30052007536)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
dopamine D2 receptor, dopamine D1 receptor, zebra finch, female song preference, courtship song, pair bonding, mate choice, monogamy, dopamine signaling, oxytocin, vasopressin
MeSH terms
Animals, Conditioning, Operant, Courtship, Dopamine, Female, Vocalization, Animal, Receptors, Dopamine D1, Receptors, Dopamine D2, Songbirds, Avian Proteins, Finches

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review