Cited by 948Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies

A role for central vasopressin in pair bonding in monogamous prairie voles

Winslow, James T., Hastings, Nick, Carter, C. Sue, Harbaugh, Carroll R., Insel, Thomas R.·1993·Nature

Abstract

Monogamous social organization is characterized by selective affiliation with a partner, high levels of paternal behaviour and, in many species, intense aggression towards strangers for defence of territory, nest and mate. Although much has been written about the evolutionary causes of monogamy, little is known about the proximate mechanisms for pair bonding in monogamous mammals. The prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster, is a monogamous, biparental rodent which exhibits long-term pair bonds characterized by selective affiliation (partner preference) and aggression. Here we describe the rapid development of both selective aggression and partner preferences following mating in the male of this species. We hypothesized that either arginine-vasopressin (AVP) or oxytocin (OT), two nine-amino-acid neuropeptides with diverse forebrain projections, could mediate the development of selective aggression and affiliation. This hypothesis was based on the following observations: (1) monogamous and polygamous voles differ specifically in the distribution of forebrain AVP and OT receptors; (2) AVP innervation in the prairie vole brain is sexually dimorphic and important for paternal behaviour; (3) central AVP pathways have been previously implicated in territorial displays and social memory; and (4) central OT pathways have been previously implicated in affiliative behaviours. We now demonstrate that central AVP is both necessary and sufficient for selective aggression and partner preference formation, two critical features of pair bonding in the monogamous prairie vole.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/365545a0

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • OT fibers in the NAcc have been mentioned previously in rats using immunohistochemistry and radioimmunoassay.

    “Although not shown in a photomicrograph, OT fibers in the NAcc have been mentioned previously in rats using immunohistochemisry [122] and radioimmunoassay [137].”
  • Monogamous male prairie voles have elevated levels of vasopressin after mating, leading to territoriality and partner protection.

    “Monogamous male prairie voles have elevated levels of the hormone vasopressin after mating, leading to territoriality and partner protection (Winslow, Hastings, Carter, Harbaugh, & Insel, 1993).”

    From Birth of a Father: Fathering in the First 1,000 Days (2019) · cites this paper as Winslow et al., 1993

  • ICV injections of OTR antagonist failed to inhibit partner preference in male prairie voles, but injections into the lateral septum did.

    “In support, ICV injections of OTR antagonist failed to inhibit partner preference in male prairie voles (Winslow et al., 1993), but injections into the lateral septum did (Liu et al., 2001).”

    From Sex-specific modulation of juvenile social play by vasopressin (2013) · cites this paper as Winslow et al., 1993

  • AVP expression within the BST and CMA is involved in a number of social behaviors, including social play behavior.

    “AVP expression within the bed nucleus of the striaterminalis (BST) and the centromedial amygdala (CMA) is known to be involved in a number of social behaviors, [18][19][20] including social play behavior.21”
  • Vasopressin facilitates selective aggression or mate guarding behaviour in male prairie voles.

    “AVP also facilitates the expression of selective aggression, or mate guarding behaviour, in male prairie voles (7).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Winslow, J. T., Hastings, N., Carter, C. S., Harbaugh, C. R., & Insel, T. R.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Mental Health (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Venue
Nature
Published
1993-10
Volume
365
Issue
6446
Pages
545-548
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2043050293
Cited by
948
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 55
FWCI
25.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Keywords
vasopressin, pair bonding, monogamy, Microtus ochrogaster, mate preferences, oxytocin, neuropeptides, social behavior, sexual dimorphism
MeSH terms
Aggression, Animals, Arginine Vasopressin, Central Nervous System, Arvicolinae, Female, Male, Oxytocin, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Receptors, Oxytocin, Antidiuretic Hormone Receptor Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review