Cited by 406Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersChemokine receptors and signalingCancer Cells and Metastasis

Blocking CXCR4 alleviates desmoplasia, increases T-lymphocyte infiltration, and improves immunotherapy in metastatic breast cancer

Open access
Chen, Ivy X., Chauhan, Vikash P., Posada, Jessica, Ng, Mei R., Wu, Michelle W., Adstamongkonkul, Pichet, Huang, Peigen, Lindeman, Neal +2 more·2019·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Although immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) along with nab-paclitaxel has increased progression-free survival in triple-negative breast cancer patients, a large fraction of metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients do not benefit from ICBs. The presence of a fibrotic tumor microenvironment can suppress the immune response to cancer. Here we found fibrosis and immunosuppression in both primary and metastatic breast cancer lesions. We show that targeting CXCR4/CXCL12 signaling, using plerixafor, an Food and Drug Administration-approved drug, reduces fibrosis, alleviates immunosuppression, and significantly enhances the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockers in preclinical models of mBC. Our findings provide a deeper understanding of mechanisms by which desmoplasia promotes immunosuppression in mBC and suggest a clinically translatable approach that can be combined with immunotherapy in patients to enhance therapeutic response.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1815515116

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interference with the action of CXCL12 produced by CAFs promotes T cell-mediated tumour control.

    “Interference with the action of CXCL12 produced by CAFs promotes T cell-mediated tumour control16,121,122”

    From A framework for advancing our understanding of cancer-associated fibroblasts (2020) · cites this paper as [122]

    The CXCR4 inhibition results (page not provided) show increased cytotoxic T-cell infiltration and reduced regulatory T cells, while the section on response to immune checkpoint blockade links CXCR4 blockade to improved T-cell access and delayed metastatic growth. The copy does not establish that the CXCL12 being interfered with was produced by CAFs; it tests CXCR4 blockade rather than specifically blocking CAF-derived CXCL12. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Better tumor blood vessels support adaptive antitumor immunity by helping tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes traffic and relocate, which improves results of immunotherapies such as immune checkpoint blockade.

    “An improved vascular network favors adaptive antitumor immunity by promoting trafficking and re-localization of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), leading to improved outcomes of various immunotherapies, including immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) (15-20).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, I. X., Chauhan, V. P., Posada, J., Ng, M. R., Wu, M. W., Adstamongkonkul, P., Huang, P., Lindeman, N., Langer, R., & Jain, R. K.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139;
Corresponding author
Jain, Rakesh K.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2019-01-30
Volume
116
Issue
10
Pages
4558-4566
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2911526204
Cited by
406
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 25
FWCI
24.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • HHS | NIH | National Cancer Institute (P01-CA080124, R01-CA098706, R01-CA208205, U01-CA224348, R35-CA197743)
  • U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH-10-1-0016, W81XWH-14-1-0034)
  • National Institute of Health (F32-CA073479, T32HL007627)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Chemokine receptors and signaling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
Keywords
CXCR4, CXCL12, plerixafor, desmoplasia, immunosuppression, T cell infiltration, immune checkpoint blockade, metastatic breast cancer, triple-negative breast cancer, nab-paclitaxel, combination immunotherapy
MeSH terms
Animals, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Immunotherapy, Neoplasm Metastasis, T-Lymphocytes, Receptors, CXCR4, Mice, Tumor Microenvironment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review