Cited by 62Primate Behavior and EcologyEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorFace Recognition and Perception

Scleral pigmentation leads to conspicuous, not cryptic, eye morphology in chimpanzees

Open access
Perea-García, Juan Olvido, Kret, Mariska E., Monteiro, Antónia, Hobaiter, Catherine·2019·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Gaze following has been argued to be uniquely human, facilitated by our depigmented, white sclera [M. Tomasello, B. Hare, H. Lehmann, J. Call, J. Hum. Evol. 52, 314–320 (2007)]—the pale area around the colored iris—and to underpin human-specific behaviors such as language. Today, we know that great apes show diverse patterns of scleral coloration [J. A. Mayhew, J. C. Gómez, Am. J. Primatol. 77, 869–877 (2015); J. O. Perea García, T. Grenzner, G. Hešková, P. Mitkidis, Commun. Integr. Biol. 10, e1264545 (2016)]. We compare scleral coloration and its relative contrast with the iris in bonobos, chimpanzees, and humans. Like humans, bonobos’ sclerae are lighter relative to the color of their irises; chimpanzee sclerae are darker than their irises. The relative contrast between the sclera and iris in all 3 species is comparable, suggesting a perceptual mechanism to explain recent evidence that nonhuman great apes also rely on gaze as a social cue.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1911410116

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [10]Belyaev D. K., Trut L. N., “ The convergent nature of incipient forms and the concept of destabilizing selection” in Vavilov’s Heritage in Modern Biology, Ovchinnikov Y. A., Rapoport I. A., Eds. (Nauka, Moscow, 1989), pp. 155– 169.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perea-García, J. O., Kret, M. E., Monteiro, A., & Hobaiter, C.
Affiliations
  • Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117557;
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2019-09-03
Volume
116
Issue
39
Pages
19248-19250
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2971661919
Cited by
62
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4
FWCI
8.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Acceda (Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria) (submittedVersion)
  • St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Royal Zoological Society of Scotland
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
scleral pigmentation, iris, gaze following, eye morphology, chimpanzees, bonobos, great apes, social cognition, gaze perception, human evolution
MeSH terms
Animals, Pan troglodytes, Eye, Eye Movements, Humans, Iris, Pigmentation, Sclera, Species Specificity, Pan paniscus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review