Cited by 339Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestockGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsGenetic diversity and population structure

Convergent genomic signatures of domestication in sheep and goats

Open access
Alberto, Florian J., Boyer, Frédéric, Orozco-terWengel, Pablo, Streeter, Ian, Servin, Bertrand, de Villemereuil, Pierre, Benjelloun, Badr, Librado, Pablo +23 more·2018·Nature Communications

Abstract

The evolutionary basis of domestication has been a longstanding question and its genetic architecture is becoming more tractable as more domestic species become genome-enabled. Before becoming established worldwide, sheep and goats were domesticated in the fertile crescent 10,500 years before present (YBP) where their wild relatives remain. Here we sequence the genomes of wild Asiatic mouflon and Bezoar ibex in the sheep and goat domestication center and compare their genomes with that of domestics from local, traditional, and improved breeds. Among the genomic regions carrying selective sweeps differentiating domestic breeds from wild populations, which are associated among others to genes involved in nervous system, immunity and productivity traits, 20 are common to Capra and Ovis . The patterns of selection vary between species, suggesting that while common targets of selection related to domestication and improvement exist, different solutions have arisen to achieve similar phenotypic end-points within these closely related livestock species.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-018-03206-y

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The genetics of domestication are relatively well understood for livestock.

    “However, domestication is a long and difficult process, but the genetics of domestication are relatively well understood for livestock143–148.”

    From Chromosomal-level reference genome assembly of muskox (Ovibos moschatus) from Banks Island in the Canadian Arctic, a resource for conservation genomics (2024) · cites this paper as [145]

    The Introduction reports that genome-wide studies have identified variants distinguishing several domestic animals from their wild counterparts. But it also says that shared domestication signatures remain largely unexplored and evidence for common genes remains elusive, so it does not support the broad assertion that livestock domestication genetics are relatively well understood. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [67]Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, E. A., DeVinney, L. C., Star, S. A. & Williams, Jr. R. M. The American Soldier: Adjustment During Army Life, Vol. 1 (Princeton University Press, Oxford, 1949).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alberto, F. J., Boyer, F., Orozco-terWengel, P., Streeter, I., Servin, B., de Villemereuil, P., Benjelloun, B., Librado, P., Biscarini, F., Colli, L., Barbato, M., Zamani, W., Alberti, A., Engelen, S., Stella, A., Joost, S., Ajmone-Marsan, P., Negrini, R., Orlando, L., Rezaei, H. R., Naderi, S., Clarke, L., Flicek, P., Wincker, P., Coissac, E., Kijas, J., Tosser-Klopp, G., Chikhi, A., Bruford, M. W., Taberlet, P., & Pompanon, F.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
  • École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse (FR)
  • Natural History Museum of Denmark (DK)
  • Parco Tecnologico Padano (IT)
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
  • Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources (IR)
  • University of Guilan (IR)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (MA)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
Corresponding author
Pompanon, François
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2018-03-06
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
813-813
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2793925946
Cited by
339
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 12
FWCI
19.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (/Z/15/Z, WT108749/Z/15/Z)
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory
  • European Commission (244356)
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-14-JFAC-0002, ANR10 LABX56), ANR-10-LABX-0056)
  • U.S. Geological Survey
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
livestock domestication, sheep, goats, selective sweeps, convergent evolution, mouflon, Capra, Ovis, breed improvement, Fertile Crescent, immune-related genes, nervous system genes, productivity traits
MeSH terms
Domestication, Whole Genome Sequencing, Animals, Animals, Domestic, Biological Evolution, Goats, Haplotypes, Phenotype, Phylogeny, Selection, Genetic, Genetic Variation, Genome, Genomics, Sheep, Domestic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review