Cited by 18Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionPrimate Behavior and Ecology

The adaptive significance of human scleral brightness: an experimental study

Open access
Wacewicz, Slawomir, Perea-García, Juan Olvido, Lewandowski, Zdzisław, Danel, Dariusz P.·2022·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Homogeneously depigmented sclerae have long been proposed to be uniquely human—an adaptation to enable cooperative behaviour by facilitating interpersonal coordination through gaze following. However, recent evidence has shown that deeply pigmented sclerae also afford gaze following if surrounding a bright iris. Furthermore, while current scleral depigmentation is clearly adaptive in modern humans, it is less clear how the evolutionarily intermediate stages of scleral pigmentation may have been adaptive. In sum, it is unclear why scleral depigmentation became the norm in humans, while not so in sister species like chimpanzees, or why some extant species display intermediate degrees of pigmentation (as our ancestors presumably did at some point). We created realistic facial images of 20 individually distinct hominins with diverse facial morphologies, each face in the (i) humanlike bright sclera and (ii) generalised apelike dark sclera version. Participants in two online studies rated the bright-sclera hominins as younger, healthier, more attractive and trustworthy, but less aggressive than the dark-sclera hominins. Our results support the idea that the appearance of more depigmented sclerae promoted perceived traits that fostered trust, increasing fitness for those individuals and resulting in depigmentation as a fixed trait in extant humans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-022-24403-2

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [20]Doshi, R. & Noohani, T. Subconjunctival hemorrhage. in StatPearls [Internet]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551666/. Accessed 23 Feb 2022 (StatPearls Publishing, 2022). 31869130
  2. [28]Al-Qaisi, M. T., Batheja, M., & Fallon, M. B. Jaundice. in Cecil Essentials of Medicine (eds. Wing, E. & Schiffman, F.). 420–425 (Elsevier, 2021).
  3. [39]Symons, D. Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder. in Sexual Nature, Sexual Culture (eds. Abramson, P. R. & Pinkerson S. D.). 80–118 (University of Chicago Press, 1995).
  4. [71]Kano F Kawaguchi Y Hanling Y Experimental evidence that uniformly white sclera enhances the visibility of eye-gaze direction in humans and chimpanzees Elife 2022 11 e74086 10.7554/eLife.74086 35256053 PMC8903827 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wacewicz, S., Perea-García, J. O., Lewandowski, Z., & Danel, D. P.
Affiliations
  • Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences (PL)
  • Ludwik Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy (PL)
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2022-11-24
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
20261-20261
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4310057238
Cited by
18
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Acceda (Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
scleral pigmentation, facial appearance perception, gaze following, interpersonal trust, facial attractiveness, chimpanzees, adaptive evolution, social cognition
MeSH terms
Animals, Pan troglodytes, Humans, Iris, Pigmentation, Sclera, Hominidae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review