Cited by 29Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMotor Control and Adaptation

Human decisions about when to act originate within a basal forebrain–nigral circuit

Open access
Khalighinejad, Nima, Priestley, Luke, Jbabdi, Saad, Rushworth, Matthew F. S.·2020·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Decisions about when to act are critical for survival in humans as in animals, but how a desire is translated into the decision that an action is worth taking at any particular point in time is incompletely understood. Here we show that a simple model developed to explain when animals decide it is worth taking an action also explains a significant portion of the variance in timing observed when humans take voluntary actions. The model focuses on the current environment’s potential for reward, the timing of the individual’s own recent actions, and the outcomes of those actions. We show, by using ultrahigh-field MRI scanning, that in addition to anterior cingulate cortex within medial frontal cortex, a group of subcortical structures including striatum, substantia nigra, basal forebrain (BF), pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN), and habenula (HB) encode trial-by-trial variation in action time. Further analysis of the activity patterns found in each area together with psychophysiological interaction analysis and structural equation modeling suggested a model in which BF integrates contextual information that will influence the decision about when to act and communicates this information, in parallel with PPN and HB influences, to nigrostriatal circuits. It is then in the nigrostriatal circuit that action initiation per se begins.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1921211117

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 7T fMRI allowed measurement of BOLD activity even in small subcortical regions such as the DRN and MBD-associated nuclei.

    “7T fMRI allowed us to measure blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) activity even in small subcortical regions such as the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN)15”

    From Two prefrontal-subcortical circuits estimate controllability and reflect its impact on learning (2026) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Discussion (page not provided) says ultrahigh-field fMRI enabled extraction of BOLD signals from small basal forebrain, midbrain, and brainstem structures. It does not identify the dorsal raphe nucleus or MBD-associated nuclei as structures measured, so those specific examples are not supported by this paper. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • AI and activity in dopaminergic midbrain areas such as SN have been reported when people evaluate whether and when to initiate an action.

    “AI and activity in dopaminergic midbrain areas such as SN have been reported when people evaluate whether and when to initiate an action28,41.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [45]Khalighinejad N., Priestley L., Jbabdi S., Rushworth M., Human decisions about when to act originate within a basal forebrain-nigral circuit, v4. Dryad. Available at 10.5061/dryad.prr4xgxhv. Deposited 23 April 2020. PMC7260969 32385157 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khalighinejad, N., Priestley, L., Jbabdi, S., & Rushworth, M. F. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
Corresponding author
Khalighinejad, Nima
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2020-05-08
Volume
117
Issue
21
Pages
11799-11810
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W3015366503
Cited by
29
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • DRYAD (public-domain)
Funders
Wellcome (WT101092MA, WT100973AIA, 203139/Z/16/Z)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
action timing, basal forebrain, substantia nigra, pedunculopontine nucleus, habenula, striatum, anterior cingulate cortex, voluntary action, reward prediction, action initiation, ultra-high field MRI, psychophysiological interaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Substantia Nigra, Basal Forebrain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review