Cited by 955Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

The habenula: from stress evasion to value-based decision-making

Open access
Hikosaka, Okihide·2010·Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Abstract

Surviving in a world with hidden rewards and dangers requires choosing the appropriate behaviours. Recent discoveries indicate that the habenula plays a prominent part in such behavioural choice through its effects on neuromodulator systems, in particular the dopamine and serotonin systems. By inhibiting dopamine-releasing neurons, habenula activation leads to the suppression of motor behaviour when an animal fails to obtain a reward or anticipates an aversive outcome. Moreover, the habenula is involved in behavioural responses to pain, stress, anxiety, sleep and reward, and its dysfunction is associated with depression, schizophrenia and drug-induced psychosis. As a highly conserved structure in the brain, the habenula provides a fundamental mechanism for both survival and decision-making.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrn2866

Cites

118 of 118 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LHb neurons are excited by omission of anticipated rewards or exposure to aversive stimuli.

    “LHb neurons are excited by omission of anticipated rewards or exposure to aversive stimuli (Lecourtier and Kelly 2007;Matsumoto and Hikosaka 2009;Hikosaka 2010;Bromberg-Martin and Hikosaka 2011).”

    From Mechanisms of Nicotine Addiction (2021) · cites this paper as Hikosaka 2010

    The Avoidance of punishment section reports that LHb neurons are excited by aversive stimuli, and the Reward-based decision-making section reports excitation by cues predicting a small reward. The paper also describes LHb reward-prediction-error signals, but the passages do not establish excitation specifically when an anticipated reward is omitted; a cue predicting no reward is not the same as an unexpected omission. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The MHb projects almost exclusively to the IPN via the fasciculus retroflexus.

    “Unlike LHb, the MHb projects almost exclusively to the interpeduncular nucleus (IPN) via the fasciculus retroflexus (Fr) (Lecourtier and Kelly 2007;Hikosaka 2010).”

    From Mechanisms of Nicotine Addiction (2021) · cites this paper as Hikosaka 2010

    The Abstract (page unavailable) says that MHb neurons project to the IPN and identifies the fasciculus retroflexus as the habenula’s output tract. It contrasts this with LHb projections to other midbrain areas, but does not establish that MHb projections to the IPN are almost exclusive. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The lateral habenula may play a role in modulating motivated behavior and addiction by modulating dopamine neurotransmission via actions on dopamine neurons in the VTA.

    “The lateral habenula may play a role in modulating motivated behavior and addiction by modulating dopamine neurotransmission via actions on dopamine neurons in the VTA (Hikosaka, 2010;Velasquez et al., 2014;Boulos et al., 2017).”

    From Drug Addiction: Hyperkatifeia/Negative Reinforcement as a Framework for Medications Development (2021) · cites this paper as Hikosaka, 2010

    The Reward-based decision-making section says the lateral habenula inhibits dopamine neurons in the VTA, and Towards a unified theory of habenula function links that inhibition to reduced motivation. The paper discusses nicotine addiction, but attributes the withdrawal-related mechanism to the medial habenula and interpeduncular nucleus; it does not support the claim that the lateral habenula modulates addiction through VTA dopamine neurons. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Significant evidence has emerged for a role for the lateral habenula-VTA circuit in driving aversive responses to the loss of reward and mediating and encoding aversive states.

    “Significant evidence has also emerged for a role for the lateral habenula-VTA circuit in driving aversive responses to the loss of reward and mediating and encoding aversive states (Hikosaka, 2010).”

    From Drug Addiction: Hyperkatifeia/Negative Reinforcement as a Framework for Medications Development (2021) · cites this paper as Hikosaka, 2010

    In “Avoidance of punishment” (page unavailable), the review says the lateral habenula signals negative stimulus value to dopamine neurons in the VTA and may contribute to suppressing movements leading to aversive outcomes. “Reward-based decision-making” describes responses to smaller-than-expected rewards. These passages support a role in encoding negative outcomes and responding to aversive stimuli, but the claim that the circuit *drives* aversive responses to reward loss states the proposed behavioral role more firmly than the source does. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The lateral habenula plays a key role in mediating and encoding aversive states.

    “The lateral habenula plays a key role in mediating and encoding aversive states.”

    From Neurobiology of addiction: a neurocircuitry analysis (2016) · cites this paper as [79]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hikosaka, O.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Hikosaka, Okihide
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2010-07
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
503-513
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W1993417422
Cited by
955
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 51
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Eye Institute (ZIAEY000415)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
habenula, value-based decision making, dopamine, serotonin, motor inhibition, stress response, anxiety, pain, reward, depression, schizophrenia, drug-induced psychosis, neuromodulation, choice behavior
MeSH terms
Animals, Avoidance Learning, Mental Disorders, Decision Making, Humans, Stress, Psychological, Habenula

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review