The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Genetically engineered mice with an additional class of cone photoreceptors: Implications for the evolution of color vision
Abstract
Among eutherian mammals, only primates possess trichromatic color vision. In Old World primates, trichromacy was made possible by a visual pigment gene duplication. In most New World primates, trichromacy is based on polymorphic variation in a single X-linked gene that produces, by random X inactivation, a patchy mosaic of spectrally distinct cone photoreceptors in heterozygous females. In the present work, we have modeled the latter strategy in a nonprimate by replacing the X-linked mouse green pigment gene with one encoding the human red pigment. In the mouse retina, the human red pigment seems to function normally, and heterozygous female mice express the human red and mouse green pigments at levels that vary between animals. Multielectrode array recordings from heterozygous female retinas reveal significant variation in the chromatic sensitivities of retinal ganglion cells. The data are consistent with a model in which these retinal ganglion cells draw their inputs indiscriminately from a coarse-grained mosaic of red and green cones. These observations support the ideas that ( i ) chromatic signals could arise from stochastic variation in inputs drawn nonselectively from red and green cones and ( ii ) tissue mosaicism due to X chromosome inactivation could be one mechanism for driving the evolution of CNS diversity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In one series of experiments, genetic manipulations were used to generate trichromatic mice (Smallwood, Olveczky, Williams, Jacobs, Reese, Meister & Nathans, 2003).”
From The genetics of normal and defective color vision (2011) · cites this paper as Smallwood, Olveczky, Williams, Jacobs, Reese, Meister & Nathans, 2003
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- 10.1242/jeb.146.1.21 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00405-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80845-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/0042-6989(83)90120-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/0042-6989(84)90181-0 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.2937147 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.94.26.14602 · DOI
- 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90181-C · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80560-7 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.92.7.2494 · DOI
- 10.1364/JOSAA.13.000641 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-08-03258.1999 · DOI
- Bush, R. A. & Sieving, P. A. (1994) Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 35, 635–645.8113014
- 10.1016/0165-0270(94)90030-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80304-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00004-7 · DOI
- 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016691 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/cne.903250302 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00062-3 · DOI
- 10.1038/353655a0 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.94.16.8860 · DOI
- 10.1038/356433a0 · DOI
- 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90320-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00306-8 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-23-10053.1998 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.289.5480.739 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0952523800174036 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00712.x · DOI
- 10.1038/367731a0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.743 · DOI
- Shaaban, S. A., Crognale, M. A., Calderone, J. B., Huang, J., Jacobs, G. H. & Deeb, S. S. (1998) Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 39, 1036–1043.9579484
- 10.1016/0042-6989(83)90128-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-5193(89)80005-0 · DOI
- Lennie P. Haake P. W. & Williams D. R. (1991) in Computational Models of Visual Processing eds. Landy M. S. & Movshon J. A. (MIT Press Cambridge MA) pp. 71–82.
- 10.1038/360677a0 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00043-8 · DOI
- Tan, S. S., Faulkner-Jones, B., Breen, S. J., Walsh, M., Bertram, J. F. & Reese, B. E. (1995) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 121, 1029–1039.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The genetics of normal and defective color vision
Neitz, J., & Neitz, M. (2011) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.12.002 · Cited by 377
Tan, E., Ding, X.-Q., Saadi, A., Agarwal, N., Naash, M. I., & Al-Ubaidi, M. R. (2004) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.03-1114 · Cited by 345
Melanopsin-Based Brightness Discrimination in Mice and Humans
Brown, T. M., Tsujimura, S.-I., Allen, A. E., Wynne, J., Bedford, R., Vickery, G., Vugler, A., & Lucas, R. J. (2012) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.04.039 · Cited by 256
Colour As a Signal for Entraining the Mammalian Circadian Clock
Walmsley, L., Hanna, L., Mouland, J., Martial, F., West, A., Smedley, A. R., Bechtold, D. A., Webb, A. R., Lucas, R. J., & Brown, T. M. (2015) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002127 · Cited by 211
Lucas, R. J., Lall, G. S., Allen, A. E., & Brown, T. M. (2012) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-59427-3.00001-0 · Cited by 195
Vertebrate ancient opsin and melanopsin: divergent irradiance detectors
Davies, W. L., Hankins, M. W., & Foster, R. G. (2010) · Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences · doi:10.1039/c0pp00203h · Cited by 100
Ventral striatum dopamine release encodes unique properties of visual stimuli in mice
Gonzalez, L. S., Fisher, A. A., D'Souza, S. P., Cotella, E. M., Lang, R. A., & Robinson, J. E. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.85064 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Smallwood, P. M., Ölveczky, B. P., Williams, G. L., Jacobs, G. H., Reese, B. E., Meister, M., & Nathans, J.
- Affiliations
- Departments of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Neuroscience, and Ophthalmology, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205; Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02138; Program in Neuroscience, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115; and Neuroscience Research Institute and Department of Psychology,...
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2003-09-19
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 11706-11711
- ISSN
- 0027-8424
- 1091-6490
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review