Cited by 89

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Genetically engineered mice with an additional class of cone photoreceptors: Implications for the evolution of color vision

Smallwood, Philip M., Ölveczky, Bence P., Williams, Gary L., Jacobs, Gerald H., Reese, Benjamin E., Meister, Markus, Nathans, Jeremy·2003·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Among eutherian mammals, only primates possess trichromatic color vision. In Old World primates, trichromacy was made possible by a visual pigment gene duplication. In most New World primates, trichromacy is based on polymorphic variation in a single X-linked gene that produces, by random X inactivation, a patchy mosaic of spectrally distinct cone photoreceptors in heterozygous females. In the present work, we have modeled the latter strategy in a nonprimate by replacing the X-linked mouse green pigment gene with one encoding the human red pigment. In the mouse retina, the human red pigment seems to function normally, and heterozygous female mice express the human red and mouse green pigments at levels that vary between animals. Multielectrode array recordings from heterozygous female retinas reveal significant variation in the chromatic sensitivities of retinal ganglion cells. The data are consistent with a model in which these retinal ganglion cells draw their inputs indiscriminately from a coarse-grained mosaic of red and green cones. These observations support the ideas that ( i ) chromatic signals could arise from stochastic variation in inputs drawn nonselectively from red and green cones and ( ii ) tissue mosaicism due to X chromosome inactivation could be one mechanism for driving the evolution of CNS diversity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1934712100

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. 10.1242/jeb.146.1.21 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00405-7 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80845-4 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/0042-6989(83)90120-7 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/0042-6989(84)90181-0 · DOI
  6. 10.1126/science.2937147 · DOI
  7. 10.1073/pnas.94.26.14602 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90181-C · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80560-7 · DOI
  10. 10.1073/pnas.92.7.2494 · DOI
  11. 10.1364/JOSAA.13.000641 · DOI
  12. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-08-03258.1999 · DOI
  13. Bush, R. A. & Sieving, P. A. (1994) Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 35, 635–645.8113014
  14. 10.1016/0165-0270(94)90030-2 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80304-9 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00004-7 · DOI
  17. 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016691 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1002/cne.903250302 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00062-3 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/353655a0 · DOI
  21. 10.1073/pnas.94.16.8860 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/356433a0 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90320-4 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00306-8 · DOI
  25. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-23-10053.1998 · DOI
  26. 10.1126/science.289.5480.739 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1017/S0952523800174036 · DOI
  28. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00712.x · DOI
  29. 10.1038/367731a0 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.743 · DOI
  31. Shaaban, S. A., Crognale, M. A., Calderone, J. B., Huang, J., Jacobs, G. H. & Deeb, S. S. (1998) Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 39, 1036–1043.9579484
  32. 10.1016/0042-6989(83)90128-1 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/S0022-5193(89)80005-0 · DOI
  34. Lennie P. Haake P. W. & Williams D. R. (1991) in Computational Models of Visual Processing eds. Landy M. S. & Movshon J. A. (MIT Press Cambridge MA) pp. 71–82.
  35. 10.1038/360677a0 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00043-8 · DOI
  37. Tan, S. S., Faulkner-Jones, B., Breen, S. J., Walsh, M., Bertram, J. F. & Reese, B. E. (1995) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 121, 1029–1039.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Smallwood, P. M., Ölveczky, B. P., Williams, G. L., Jacobs, G. H., Reese, B. E., Meister, M., & Nathans, J.
Affiliations
Departments of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Neuroscience, and Ophthalmology, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205; Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02138; Program in Neuroscience, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115; and Neuroscience Research Institute and Department of Psychology,...
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2003-09-19
Volume
100
Issue
20
Pages
11706-11711
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
89
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review