Cited by 48

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The intrinsic instability of the hydrolase domain of lipoprotein lipase facilitates its inactivation by ANGPTL4-catalyzed unfolding

Leth-Espensen, Katrine Z., Kristensen, Kristian K., Kumari, Anni, Winther, Anne-Marie L., Young, Stephen G., Jørgensen, Thomas J. D., Ploug, Michael·2021·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Dietary lipids are packaged into triglyceride-rich lipoprotein particles and delivered to many tissues via the bloodstream. A complex of lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and its endothelial cell receptor, GPIHBP1, hydrolyzes lipoprotein triglycerides, releasing fatty acids for uptake by surrounding cells. The efficiency of triglyceride hydrolysis is regulated by physiologic LPL inhibitors: ANGPTL-3, -4, and -8. We defined the binding site for ANGPTL4 on LPL and showed that ANGPTL4 induces allosteric changes in LPL that progress to irreversible unfolding and collapse of LPL’s catalytic site. The binding of GPIHBP1 to LPL augments LPL stability and renders LPL less susceptible to inactivation by ANGPTL4. Our studies provide crucial insights into molecular mechanisms that regulate intravascular triglyceride metabolism.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2026650118

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LPL bound to GPIHBP1 is largely protected from ANGPTL4.

    “LPL bound to GPIHBP1 is largely protected from ANGPTL4 (51, 52, 60, 98).”
  • ANGPTL4 can act on monomeric LPL and increases the inherent instability of LPL resulting in unfolding of LPL's catalytic domain.

    “Indeed, a recent series of studies from the laboratory of Michael Ploug have shown that ANGPTL4 can act on monomeric LPL, and that ANGPTL4 increases the inherent instability of LPL resulting in the unfolding of LPL’s catalytic domain (52, 97, 98).”
  • Several studies have indicated that ANGPTL4 catalytically inactivates LPL.

    “Several studies have indicated that ANGPTL4 catalytically inactivates LPL (49, 51, 52, 97, 98).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.1194/jlr.ILR120000735 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.01.017 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.05.023 · DOI
  4. 10.1056/NEJMoa1611930 · DOI
  5. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.305085 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.jacl.2015.09.007 · DOI
  7. 10.1074/jbc.M114.558528 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.08.016 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/ng.3561 · DOI
  10. 10.3390/ijms20112760 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.04.016 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1073/pnas.1806774115 · DOI
  13. 10.7554/eLife.12095 · DOI
  14. 10.7554/eLife.20958 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1194/jlr.M900145-JLR200 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1074/jbc.M114.623769 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1194/jlr.ILR120000780 · DOI
  18. 10.1098/rsob.150272 · DOI
  19. 10.1194/jlr.M075689 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1210/en.2016-1894 · DOI
  21. 10.1194/jlr.RA120000781 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1194/jlr.M088807 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.molmet.2020.101033 · DOI
  24. 10.1172/jci.insight.138777 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1074/jbc.M113.497602 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1074/jbc.RA118.005932 · DOI
  27. 10.1073/pnas.0604026103 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1073/pnas.1920202117 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1073/pnas.1900983116 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1074/jbc.RA119.011079 · DOI
  31. 10.1074/jbc.M807899200 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1073/pnas.1817984116 · DOI
  33. 10.1194/jlr.D119000388 · DOI
  34. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c01828 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/s41592-019-0459-y · DOI
  36. 10.1146/annurev-biophys-062215-011121 · DOI
  37. 10.1039/C0CS00113A · DOI
  38. 10.1002/anie.201402796 · DOI
  39. 10.1194/jlr.M067363 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1074/jbc.RA118.002426 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1016/j.molmet.2017.06.014 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1074/jbc.M111.303529 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1016/0076-6879(91)97160-Z · DOI
  44. 10.1074/jbc.RA119.007847 · DOI
  45. 10.1007/s13361-013-0727-5 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Leth-Espensen, K. Z., Kristensen, K. K., Kumari, A., Winther, A.-M. L., Young, S. G., Jørgensen, T. J. D., & Ploug, M.
Affiliations
  • Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark;
  • Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095;
  • Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark;
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2021-03-15
Volume
118
Issue
12
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
48
References
5
Language
en
Funders
  • HHS | NIH | National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL146358, HL087228, HL139725)
  • Lundbeckfonden (R230-2016-2930)
  • Novo Nordisk (NNF18OC0033864, NNF20OC0063444)
  • The John and Birthe Meyer Foundation (0)
  • The European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (801481)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review