Cited by 28Visual Attention and Saliency DetectionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

The attention schema theory in a neural network agent: Controlling visuospatial attention using a descriptive model of attention

Open access
Wilterson, Andrew I., Graziano, Michael S. A.·2021·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Attention, the deep processing of select items, is one of the most important cognitive operations in the brain. But how does the brain control its attention? One proposed part of the mechanism is that the brain builds a model, or attention schema, that helps monitor and predict the changing state of attention. Here, we show that an artificial neural network agent can be trained to control visual attention when it is given an attention schema, but its performance is greatly reduced when the schema is not available. We suggest that the brain may have evolved a model of attention because of the profound practical benefit for the control of attention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2102421118

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 81 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [44]P. Hsieh, J. T. Colas, N. Kanwisher, Unconscious pop-out: Attentional capture by unseen feature singletons only when top-down attention is available. Psychol. Sci. 22, 1220– 1226 (2011). 21852451 PMC3264049

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilterson, A. I., & Graziano, M. S. A.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Graziano, Michael S. A.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2021-08-12
Volume
118
Issue
33
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W3127825725
Cited by
26
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
attention schema theory, visuospatial attention, deep Q-learning, computational modeling of attention
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Attention, Neural Networks, Computer, Spatial Processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review