The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Different patterns of human discrimination learning for two interaural cues to sound-source location
Open accessAbstract
Two of the primary cues used to localize the sources of sounds are interaural level differences (ILDs) and interaural time differences (ITDs). We conducted two experiments to explore how practice affects the human discrimination of values of ILDs and ongoing ITDs presented over headphones. We measured discrimination thresholds of 13 to 32 naive listeners in a variety of conditions during a pretest and again, 2 weeks later, during a posttest. Between those two tests, we trained a subset of listeners 1 h per day for 9 days on a single ILD or ITD condition. Listeners improved on both ILD and ITD discrimination. Improvement was initially rapid for both cue types and appeared to generalize broadly across conditions, indicating conceptual or procedural learning. A subsequent slower-improvement stage, which occurred solely for the ILD cue, only affected conditions with the trained stimulus frequency, suggesting that stimulus processing had fundamentally changed. These different learning patterns indicate that practice affects the attention to, or low-level encoding of, ILDs and ITDs at sites at which the two cue types are processed separately. Thus, these data reveal differences in the effect of practice on ILD and ITD discrimination, and provide insight into the encoding of these two cues to sound-source location in humans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Recanzone, G., Schreiner, C., & Merzenich, M. (1993) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.13-01-00087.1993 · Cited by 1,266
Attentional control of early perceptual learning.
Ahissar, M., & Hochstein, S. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.12.5718 · Cited by 497
Three remarks on perceptual learning
Mollon, J. D., & Danilova, M. V. (1996) · Spatial Vision · doi:10.1163/156856896x00051 · Cited by 175
Cited by
Dyslexia and the anchoring-deficit hypothesis
Ahissar, M. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.015 · Cited by 254
Multisensory perceptual learning and sensory substitution
Proulx, M. J., Brown, D. J., Pasqualotto, A., & Meijer, P. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.11.017 · Cited by 148
Eisner, F., McGettigan, C., Faulkner, A., Rosen, S., & Scott, S. K. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4040-09.2010 · Cited by 108
Does feedback matter in an auditory frequency discrimination learning task?
Zaltz, Roth, & Kishon-Rabin (2010) · Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1515/jbcpp.2010.21.3.241 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Wright, B. A., & Fitzgerald, M. B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2001-10-09
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 12307-12312
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2017894874
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 1.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Different patterns of human discrimination learning for two interaural cues to sound-source location. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.211220498
- The paper
- Wright, B. A., & Fitzgerald, M. B. (2001). Different patterns of human discrimination learning for two interaural cues to sound-source location. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.211220498
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.