Cited by 9Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain function

Movement-dependent electrical stimulation for volitional strengthening of cortical connections in behaving monkeys

Open access
Moorjani, Samira, Walvekar, Sarita, Fetz, Eberhard E., Perlmutter, Steve I.·2022·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Correlated activity of neurons can lead to long-term strengthening or weakening of the connections between them. In addition, the behavioral context, imparted by execution of physical movements or the presence of a reward, can modulate the plasticity induced by Hebbian mechanisms. In the present study, we have combined behavior and induced neuronal correlations to strengthen connections in the motor cortex of adult behaving monkeys. Correlated activity was induced using an electrical-conditioning protocol in which stimuli gated by voluntary movements were used to produce coactivation of neurons at motor-cortical sites involved in those movements. Delivery of movement-dependent stimulation resulted in small increases in the strength of associated cortical connections immediately after conditioning. Remarkably, when paired with further repetition of the movements that gated the conditioning stimuli, there were substantially larger gains in the strength of cortical connections, which occurred in a use-dependent manner, without delivery of additional conditioning stimulation. In the absence of such movements, little change was observed in the strength of motor-cortical connections. Performance of the motor behavior in the absence of conditioning also did not produce any changes in connectivity. Our results show that combining movement-gated stimulation with further natural use of the “conditioned” pathways after stimulation ends can produce use-dependent strengthening of connections in adult primates, highlighting an important role for behavior in cortical plasticity. Our data also provide strong support for combining movement-gated stimulation with use-dependent physical rehabilitation for strengthening connections weakened by a stroke or spinal cord injury.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2116321119

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Establishing a continuous link between the brain and spinal cord promotes the reorganization of residual neuronal pathways that link these two regions under normal physiological conditions.

    “This cooperation probably plays an essential role in the reorganization of neuronal pathways that mediate neurological recovery in response to neurorehabilitation with the BSI.”

    From Walking naturally after spinal cord injury using a brain–spine interface (2023) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Discussion (Interplay between Various Forms of Plasticity; page unavailable) describes interactions between conditioning, behavior and other forms of plasticity that strengthen cortical connections. The Conclusions propose combining movement-gated stimulation with physical therapy to enhance motor recovery. The study does not establish a continuous brain–spinal cord link or show that such a link reorganizes residual pathways during BSI neurorehabilitation. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 77 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [71]National Research Council, Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, ed. 8, 2011).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moorjani, S., Walvekar, S., Fetz, E. E., & Perlmutter, S. I.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Moorjani, Samira
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2022-06-27
Volume
119
Issue
27
Pages
e2116321119-e2116321119
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W4283584930
Cited by
9
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • HHS | National Institutes of Health (RR00166, NS12542)
  • National Science Foundation Center for Neurotechnology (EEC-1028725)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
cortical plasticity, motor cortex, use-dependent plasticity, Hebbian learning, motor rehabilitation, stroke, spinal cord injury
MeSH terms
Animals, Haplorhini, Electric Stimulation, Motor Cortex, Movement, Neuronal Plasticity, Volition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review