Cited by 145Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMotor Control and AdaptationMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity in Primate Corticospinal Connections Induced during Free Behavior

Open access
Nishimura, Yukio, Perlmutter, Steve I., Eaton, Ryan W., Fetz, Eberhard E.·2013·Neuron

Abstract

Motor learning and functional recovery from brain damage involve changes in the strength of synaptic connections between neurons. Relevant in vivo evidence on the underlying cellular mechanisms remains limited and indirect. We found that the strength of neural connections between motor cortex and spinal cord in monkeys can be modified with an autonomous recurrent neural interface that delivers electrical stimuli in the spinal cord triggered by action potentials of corticospinal cells during free behavior. The activity-dependent stimulation modified the strength of the terminal connections of single corticomotoneuronal cells, consistent with a bidirectional spike-timing-dependent plasticity rule previously derived from in vitro experiments. For some cells, the changes lasted for days after the end of conditioning, but most effects eventually reverted to preconditioning levels. These results provide direct evidence of corticospinal synaptic plasticity in vivo at the level of single neurons induced by normal firing patterns during free behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.08.028

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Establishing a continuous link between the brain and spinal cord promotes the reorganization of residual neuronal pathways that link these two regions under normal physiological conditions.

    “This cooperation probably plays an essential role in the reorganization of neuronal pathways that mediate neurological recovery in response to neurorehabilitation with the BSI.”

    From Walking naturally after spinal cord injury using a brain–spine interface (2023) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Abstract and Discussion report that an activity-dependent brain–spinal interface changed the strength of corticospinal connections in monkeys during free behavior. The Clinical relevance section suggests that a similar approach could strengthen spared connections in patients, but the study does not establish reorganization that mediates neurological recovery during BSI neurorehabilitation. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nishimura, Y., Perlmutter, S. I., Eaton, R. W., & Fetz, E. E.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
  • Nishimura, Yukio
  • Fetz, Eberhard E.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
80
Issue
5
Pages
1301-1309
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044857133
Cited by
145
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5
FWCI
5.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • W. M. Keck Foundation
  • Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS012542, NS 40867, R37NS012542, NS12542, R01NS040867)
  • Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
spike-timing-dependent plasticity, synaptic plasticity, motor cortex, spinal cord, bidirectional plasticity, electrical stimulation, motor learning, monkeys, free behavior
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Biophysics, Circadian Rhythm, Electric Stimulation, Electromyography, Macaca nemestrina, Male, Motor Neurons, Nerve Net, Neural Inhibition, Neuronal Plasticity, Pyramidal Tracts, Time Factors, Wakefulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review