Cited by 90Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsEvolution and Paleontology StudiesPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology

Environmental drivers of the first major animal extinction across the Ediacaran White Sea-Nama transition

Open access
Evans, Scott D., Tu, Chenyi, Rizzo, Adriana, Surprenant, Rachel L., Boan, Phillip C., McCandless, Heather, Marshall, Nathan, Xiao, Shuhai +1 more·2022·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The Ediacara Biota—the oldest communities of complex, macroscopic fossils—consists of three temporally distinct assemblages: the Avalon (ca. 575–560 Ma), White Sea (ca. 560–550 Ma), and Nama (ca. 550–539 Ma). Generic diversity varies among assemblages, with a notable decline at the transition from White Sea to Nama. Preservation and sampling biases, biotic replacement, and environmental perturbation have been proposed as potential mechanisms for this drop in diversity. Here, we compile a global database of the Ediacara Biota, specifically targeting taphonomic and paleoecological characters, to test these hypotheses. Major ecological shifts in feeding mode, life habit, and tiering level accompany an increase in generic richness between the Avalon and White Sea assemblages. We find that ∼80% of White Sea taxa are absent from the Nama interval, comparable to loss during Phanerozoic mass extinctions. The paleolatitudes, depositional environments, and preservational modes that characterize the White Sea assemblage are well represented in the Nama, indicating that this decline is not the result of sampling bias. Counter to expectations of the biotic replacement model, there are minimal ecological differences between these two assemblages. However, taxa that disappear exhibit a variety of morphological and behavioral characters consistent with an environmentally driven extinction event. The preferential survival of taxa with high surface area relative to volume may suggest that this was related to reduced global oceanic oxygen availability. Thus, our data support a link between Ediacaran biotic turnover and environmental change, similar to other major mass extinctions in the geologic record.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2207475119

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both the Avalon and White Sea paleocommunities largely disappeared by ~550.5 Ma.

    “Both the Avalon and White Sea paleocommunities largely disappeared by ~550.5 Ma (25, 27, 28)”

    From Sea level controls on Ediacaran-Cambrian animal radiations (2024) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Results report that about 80% of White Sea genera were lost in the transition to the Nama assemblage, and the Discussion places this decline around 550 Ma (page numbers unavailable). The cited passages distinguish the earlier Avalon assemblage but do not establish how much of it disappeared or date its disappearance to ~550.5 Ma. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evans, S. D., Tu, C., Rizzo, A., Surprenant, R. L., Boan, P. C., McCandless, H., Marshall, N., Xiao, S., & Droser, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Tech (US)
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
Corresponding author
Evans, Scott D.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2022-11-07
Volume
119
Issue
46
Pages
e2207475119-e2207475119
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W4308430347
Cited by
90
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 16
FWCI
12.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
  • VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Agouron Institute (Geobiology Fellowship)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (80NSSC19K0472)
  • National Science Foundation (EAR2021207)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Keywords
Ediacaran biota, White Sea, Nama, Avalon, taphonomy, paleoecology, paleolatitude, surface-to-volume ratio, feeding mode, early animal evolution
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Evolution, Fossils, Oceans and Seas, Extinction, Biological, Biota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review