Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,029

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electroporation and RNA interference in the rodent retina in vivo and in vitro

Open access
Matsuda, Takahiko, Cepko, Constance L.·2004·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The large number of candidate genes made available by comprehensive genome analysis requires that relatively rapid techniques for the study of function be developed. Here, we report a rapid and convenient electroporation method for both gain- and loss-of-function studies in vivo and in vitro in the rodent retina. Plasmid DNA directly injected into the subretinal space of neonatal rodent pups was taken up by a significant fraction of exposed cells after several pulses of high voltage. With this technique, GFP expression vectors were efficiently transfected into retinal cells with little damage to the operated pups. Transfected GFP allowed clear visualization of cell morphologies, and the expression persisted for at least 50 days. DNA-based RNA interference vectors directed against two transcription factors important in photoreceptor development led to photoreceptor phenotypes similar to those of the corresponding knockout mice. Reporter constructs carrying retinal cell type-specific promoters were readily introduced into the retina in vivo , where they exhibited the appropriate expression patterns. Plasmid DNA was also efficiently transfected into retinal explants in vitro by high-voltage pulses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2235688100

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00379-1 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00219-X · DOI
  3. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00574-8 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1073/pnas.84.1.156 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/328131a0 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/0896-6273(90)90136-4 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1073/pnas.94.19.10319 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1073/pnas.94.13.6916 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1006/dbio.2001.0181 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/0378-1119(91)90434-D · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90091-5 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1126/science.1067081 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90355-4 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/emboj/18.17.4754 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1073/pnas.94.7.3088 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1073/pnas.082117599 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-04-01425.1997 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-10-03738.1998 · DOI
  19. Molday, R. S. (1989) Prog. Ret. Res. 8, 173–209.
  20. 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00422-6 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1074/jbc.M105855200 · DOI
  22. 10.1128/mcb.10.8.4406-4411.1990 · DOI
  23. 10.1093/nar/24.9.1787 · DOI
  24. Kennedy, B. N., Huang, J., Saari, J. C. & Crabb, J. W. (1998) Mol. Vis. 4, 14–21.9736766
  25. 10.1074/jbc.275.2.1247 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1002/cne.10491 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/42475 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81171-X · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1073/pnas.092143499 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1038/nbt0502-497 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1038/nbt0502-500 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1038/nbt0502-505 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1126/science.1068999 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Paddison, P. J., Caudy, A. A., Bernstein, E., Hannon, G. J. & Conklin, D. S. (2002) Genes Dev. 16, 498–458.
  35. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80439-0 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80440-7 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80394-3 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1073/pnas.89.1.266 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1038/70591 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1006/dbio.2001.0439 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00016-1 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1074/jbc.M102420200 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1016/S0968-4328(01)00002-6 · DOI
  44. Hatakeyama, J., Tomita, K., Inoue, T. & Kageyama, R. (2001) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 128, 1313–1322.
  45. Inoue, T., Hojo, M., Bessho, Y., Tano, Y., Lee, J. E. & Kageyama, R. (2002) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 129, 831–824.

Cited by

See all 1,029

Metadata

Authors
Matsuda, T., & Cepko, C. L.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2003-11-05
Volume
101
Issue
1
Pages
16-22
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1968800607
Cited by
1,029
References
1
FWCI
9.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electroporation and RNA interference in the rodent retina in vivo and in vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.2235688100
The paper
Matsuda, T., & Cepko, C. L. (2004). Electroporation and RNA interference in the rodent retina in vivo and in vitro. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2235688100

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.