The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mechanism for the Selective Interaction of C-terminal Eps15 Homology Domain Proteins with Specific Asn-Pro-Phe-containing Partners
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
EHD1 binding to SNX17 is atypical because most of the EHD1 interaction partners identified to date interact via NPF motifs.
“EHD1 binding to SNX17 is atypical because most of the EHD1 interaction partners identified to date interact via NPF motifs”
From Sorting nexin 17 (SNX17) links endosomal sorting to Eps15 homology domain protein 1 (EHD1)–mediated fission machinery (2020) · cites this paper as [47]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- Grant, 2008, Traffic, 9, 2043, 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00834.x · DOI · Paper page
- Daumke, 2007, Nature, 449, 923, 10.1038/nature06173 · DOI · Paper page
- Lee, 2005, J. Biol. Chem., 280, 17213, 10.1074/jbc.M412751200 · DOI
- Naslavsky, 2006, Mol. Biol. Cell, 17, 163, 10.1091/mbc.e05-05-0466 · DOI · Paper page
- Miliaras, 2004, Cell Biochem. Biophys, 41, 295, 10.1385/CBB:41:2:295 · DOI
- Naslavsky, 2005, J. Cell Sci., 118, 4093, 10.1242/jcs.02595 · DOI · Paper page
- Grant, 2001, Nat. Cell Biol., 3, 573, 10.1038/35078549 · DOI
- Lin, 2001, Nat. Cell Biol., 3, 567, 10.1038/35078543 · DOI · Paper page
- Caplan, 2002, EMBO J., 21, 2557, 10.1093/emboj/21.11.2557 · DOI · Paper page
- Rapaport, 2006, Traffic, 7, 52, 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2005.00359.x · DOI · Paper page
- Naslavsky, 2009, J. Cell Sci., 122, 389, 10.1242/jcs.037051 · DOI
- Gokool, 2007, Traffic, 8, 1873, 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2007.00652.x · DOI · Paper page
- George, 2007, BMC Cell Biol., 8, 3, 10.1186/1471-2121-8-3 · DOI · Paper page
- Sharma, 2008, Traffic, 9, 995, 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00732.x · DOI · Paper page
- Guilherme, 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 10593, 10.1074/jbc.M307702200 · DOI · Paper page
- Park, 2004, Biochemistry, 43, 7552, 10.1021/bi049970f · DOI
- Fazioli, 1993, Mol. Cell. Biol., 13, 5814
- Wong, 1995, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 92, 9530, 10.1073/pnas.92.21.9530 · DOI
- Kieken, 2007, J. Biomol. NMR, 39, 323, 10.1007/s10858-007-9196-0 · DOI
- de Beer, 1998, Science, 281, 1357, 10.1126/science.281.5381.1357 · DOI
- de Beer, 2000, Nat. Struct. Biol., 7, 1018, 10.1038/80924 · DOI
- Paoluzi, 1998, EMBO J., 17, 6541, 10.1093/emboj/17.22.6541 · DOI
- Salcini, 1997, Genes Dev., 11, 2239, 10.1101/gad.11.17.2239 · DOI · Paper page
- Confalonieri, 2002, FEBS Lett., 513, 24, 10.1016/S0014-5793(01)03241-0 · DOI
- Barbosa, 1996, Nature, 382, 262, 10.1038/382262a0 · DOI
- Linge, 2001, Methods Enzymol., 339, 71, 10.1016/S0076-6879(01)39310-2 · DOI
- Laskowski, 1996, J. Biomol. NMR, 8, 477, 10.1007/BF00228148 · DOI · Paper page
- Koradi, 1996, J. Mol. Graph., 14, 51, 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00009-4 · DOI
- Naslavsky, 2004, Mol. Biol. Cell, 15, 2410, 10.1091/mbc.e03-10-0733 · DOI
- Kieken, 2009, Protein Sci., 18, 2471, 10.1002/pro.258 · DOI
- Sharma, 2009, Mol. Biol. Cell, 20, 5181, 10.1091/mbc.e09-06-0535 · DOI · Paper page
- Nishimura, 2008, J. Med. Invest., 55, 9, 10.2152/jmi.55.9 · DOI
- Gao, 2006, Biochemistry, 45, 1785, 10.1021/bi051856p · DOI
- Zhang, 2005, J. Biol. Chem., 280, 20356, 10.1074/jbc.M500511200 · DOI
- Conner, 2002, J. Cell Biol., 156, 921, 10.1083/jcb.200108123 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bhattacharyya, S., Rainey, M. A., Arya, P., Mohapatra, B. C., Mushtaq, I., Dutta, S., George, M., Storck, M. D., McComb, R. D., Muirhead, D., et al. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep20727 · Cited by 36
Dhawan, K., Naslavsky, N., & Caplan, S. (2020) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.ra119.011368 · Cited by 36
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kieken, F., Sharma, M., Jović, M., Giridharan, S. S. P., Naslavsky, N., Caplan, S., & Sorgen, P. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 285
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 8687-8694
- ISSN
- 0021-9258
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review