Cited by 173

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

MICAL-L1 Links EHD1 to Tubular Recycling Endosomes and Regulates Receptor Recycling

Sharma, Mahak, Panapakkam Giridharan, Sai Srinivas, Rahajeng, Juliati, Naslavsky, Naava, Caplan, Steve·2009·Molecular Biology of the Cell

Abstract

Endocytic recycling of receptors and lipids occurs via a complex network of tubular and vesicular membranes. EHD1 is a key regulator of endocytosis and associates with tubular membranes to facilitate recycling. Although EHD proteins tubulate membranes in vitro, EHD1 primarily associates with preexisting tubules in vivo. How EHD1 is recruited to these tubular endosomes remains unclear. We have determined that the Rab8-interacting protein, MICAL-L1, associates with EHD1, with both proteins colocalizing to long tubular membranes, in vitro and in live cells. MICAL-L1 is a largely uncharacterized member of the MICAL-family of proteins that uniquely contains two asparagine-proline-phenylalanine motifs, sequences that typically interact with EH-domains. Our data show that the MICAL-L1 C-terminal coiled-coil region is necessary and sufficient for its localization to tubular membranes. Moreover, we provide unexpected evidence that endogenous MICAL-L1 can link both EHD1 and Rab8a to these structures, as its depletion leads to loss of the EHD1-Rab8a interaction and the absence of both of these proteins from the membrane tubules. Finally, we demonstrate that MICAL-L1 is essential for efficient endocytic recycling. These data implicate MICAL-L1 as an unusual type of Rab effector that regulates endocytic recycling by recruiting and linking EHD1 and Rab8a on membrane tubules.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1091/mbc.e09-06-0535

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Ang A. L., 2003, J. Cell Biol, 163, 339, 10.1083/jcb.200307046 · DOI
  2. 10.1091/mbc.e05-01-0076 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Caplan S., 2002, EMBO J, 21, 2557, 10.1093/emboj/21.11.2557 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Conner S. D., 2003, Nature, 422, 37, 10.1038/nature01451 · DOI
  5. Daumke O., 2007, Nature, 449, 923, 10.1038/nature06173 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Fischer J., 2005, Biophys. Res. Commun, 328, 415, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.12.182 · DOI
  7. Fukuda M., 2008, Mol. Cell Proteom, 7, 1031, 10.1074/mcp.M700569-MCP200 · DOI
  8. George M., 2007, BMC Cell Biol, 8, 3, 10.1186/1471-2121-8-3 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Grant B., 2001, Nat. Cell Biol, 3, 573, 10.1038/35078549 · DOI
  10. Grant B. D., 2008, Traffic, 9, 2043, 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00834.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. Grosshans B. L., 2006, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 11821, 10.1073/pnas.0601617103 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Hattula K., 2006, J. Cell Sci, 119, 4866, 10.1242/jcs.03275 · DOI
  13. 10.1091/mbc.e07-09-0902 · DOI
  14. Hopkins C. R., 1983, Cell, 35, 321, 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90235-0 · DOI
  15. Huber L. A., 1993, J. Cell Biol, 123, 35, 10.1083/jcb.123.1.35 · DOI
  16. 10.1091/mbc.e08-11-1102 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Jovic M., 2007, J. Cell Sci, 120, 802, 10.1242/jcs.03383 · DOI
  18. Lee D. W., 2005, J. Biol. Chem, 280, 280
  19. Lin S. X., 2001, Nat. Cell Biol, 3, 567, 10.1038/35078543 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Linder M. D., 2006, Mol. Biol. Cell, 18, 47, 10.1091/mbc.e06-07-0575 · DOI
  21. Maxfield F. R., 2004, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol, 5, 121, 10.1038/nrm1315 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Mayor S., 2007, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol, 8, 603, 10.1038/nrm2216 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1091/mbc.e03-10-0733 · DOI
  24. Naslavsky N., 2005, J. Cell Sci, 118, 4093, 10.1242/jcs.02595 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Naslavsky N., 2007, J. Biol. Chem, 282, 16612, 10.1074/jbc.M609493200 · DOI
  26. 10.1091/mbc.e05-05-0466 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1091/mbc.02-04-0053 · DOI
  28. Nishimura N., 2008, J. Med. Invest, 55, 9, 10.2152/jmi.55.9 · DOI
  29. Pfeffer S., 2004, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol, 5, 886, 10.1038/nrm1500 · DOI
  30. Rapaport D., 2006, Traffic, 7, 52, 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2005.00359.x · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1091/mbc.e07-02-0169 · DOI
  32. Sharma M., 2009, Commun. Integr. Biol, 2, 431, 10.4161/cib.2.5.9157 · DOI
  33. Sharma M., 2008, Traffic, 9, 995, 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00732.x · DOI · Paper page
  34. Suzuki T., 2002, J. Biol. Chem, 277, 14933, 10.1074/jbc.M111842200 · DOI
  35. 10.1091/mbc.e05-09-0826 · DOI
  36. Weide T., 2003, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun, 306, 79, 10.1016/S0006-291X(03)00918-5 · DOI
  37. Xu Y., 2004, Mol. Membr. Biol, 21, 269, 10.1080/09687680410001716871 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1091/mbc.e07-06-0551 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sharma, M., Panapakkam Giridharan, S. S., Rahajeng, J., Naslavsky, N., & Caplan, S.
Affiliations
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Eppley Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-5870
Venue
Molecular Biology of the Cell
Published
2009-12-15
Volume
20
Issue
24
Pages
5181-5194
ISSN
  • 1059-1524
  • 1939-4586
Cited by
173
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review