Cited by 66

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

AMSH Interacts with ESCRT-0 to Regulate the Stability and Trafficking of CXCR4

Sierra, Maria I., Wright, Michelle H., Nash, Piers D.·2010·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Reversible ubiquitination is essential for the endocytic sorting and down-regulation of G protein-coupled receptors, such as the chemokine receptor CXCR4. The deubiquitinating enzyme AMSH has been implicated in the endocytic sorting of both G protein-coupled receptors and receptor-tyrosine kinases. Herein, we examine the role of AMSH in the regulation of CXCR4 stability and trafficking and characterize protein-protein interactions critical for this function. Loss of AMSH catalytic activity or depletion by RNAi results in increased steady-state levels of CXCR4 under basal conditions. Analysis of truncation and point mutation of AMSH reveal the importance of an RXXK motif for CXCR4 degradation. The RXXK motif of AMSH interacts with the SH3 domains of the STAM and Grb2 families of adaptor proteins with high affinity. Cells expressing a catalytically inactive mutant of AMSH show basal hyperubiquitination, but not increased degradation, of the ESCRT-0 components STAM1 and Hrs. This is dependent on the RXXK motif of AMSH. Ubiquitination of endocytic machinery modulates their activity, suggesting that AMSH may directly regulate endocytic adaptor protein function. This is reflected in CXCR4 trafficking and provides a mechanism by which AMSH specifies the fate of endocytosed receptors. Taken together, these studies implicate AMSH as a key modulator of receptor fate determination through its action on components of the endocytic machinery.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m109.061309

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. von Zastrow, 2003, Life Sci, 74, 217, 10.1016/j.lfs.2003.09.008 · DOI
  2. Sorkin, 2002, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 3, 600, 10.1038/nrm883 · DOI
  3. Lefkowitz, 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 18677, 10.1074/jbc.273.30.18677 · DOI
  4. Tsao, 2001, Trends Pharmacol Sci, 22, 91, 10.1016/S0165-6147(00)01620-5 · DOI
  5. Di Fiore, 2003, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 4, 491, 10.1038/nrm1124 · DOI
  6. Haglund, 2003, Trends Biochem. Sci, 28, 598, 10.1016/j.tibs.2003.09.005 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Höller, 2004, Biochem. Pharmacol, 67, 1013, 10.1016/j.bcp.2004.01.003 · DOI
  8. Hanyaloglu, 2008, Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 48, 537, 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.48.113006.094830 · DOI
  9. Marchese, 2008, Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 48, 601, 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.48.113006.094646 · DOI
  10. Shenoy, 2007, Circ. Res., 100, 1142, 10.1161/01.RES.0000261939.88744.5a · DOI
  11. Bleul, 1996, Nature, 382, 829, 10.1038/382829a0 · DOI
  12. Oberlin, 1996, Nature, 382, 833, 10.1038/382833a0 · DOI
  13. Zou, 1998, Nature, 393, 595, 10.1038/31269 · DOI
  14. Peled, 1999, J. Clin. Invest., 104, 1199, 10.1172/JCI7615 · DOI
  15. Tachibana, 1998, Nature, 393, 591, 10.1038/31261 · DOI
  16. Feng, 1996, Science, 272, 872, 10.1126/science.272.5263.872 · DOI
  17. Walter, 2005, Circ. Res., 97, 1142, 10.1161/01.RES.0000193596.94936.2c · DOI
  18. Balkwill, 2004, Semin. Cancer Biol., 14, 171, 10.1016/j.semcancer.2003.10.003 · DOI
  19. Diaz, 2005, Immunol. Rev., 203, 235, 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2005.00226.x · DOI
  20. Diaz, 2005, Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep., 5, 350, 10.1007/s11882-005-0005-0 · DOI
  21. Gulino, 2003, Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 3, 443, 10.1097/00130832-200312000-00005 · DOI
  22. Roland, 2003, Blood, 101, 399, 10.1182/blood-2002-03-0978 · DOI
  23. Marchese, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 45509, 10.1074/jbc.C100527200 · DOI
  24. Marchese, 2003, Dev. Cell, 5, 709, 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00321-6 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Bhandari, 2007, J. Biol. Chem., 282, 36971, 10.1074/jbc.M705085200 · DOI
  26. Venkatesan, 2003, Mol. Biol. Cell, 14, 3305, 10.1091/mbc.e02-11-0714 · DOI
  27. Mines, 2009, J. Biol. Chem., 284, 5742, 10.1074/jbc.M808507200 · DOI
  28. Zhang, 2004, Stem Cells, 22, 1015, 10.1634/stemcells.22-6-1015 · DOI
  29. Futahashi, 2007, Cancer Sci., 98, 373, 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00388.x · DOI
  30. Wojcik, 2002, Trends Cell Biol., 12, 549, 10.1016/S0962-8924(02)02398-X · DOI
  31. Urbé, 2006, Biochem. Soc Trans, 34, 754, 10.1042/BST0340754 · DOI
  32. Clague, 2006, Trends Cell Biol., 16, 551, 10.1016/j.tcb.2006.09.002 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Williams, 2007, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 8, 355, 10.1038/nrm2162 · DOI
  34. Komada, 2008, Curr. Drug Discov. Technol., 5, 78, 10.2174/157016308783769469 · DOI
  35. Mukhopadhyay, 2007, Science, 315, 201, 10.1126/science.1127085 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Song, 2008, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 20, 156, 10.1016/j.ceb.2008.01.012 · DOI
  37. McCullough, 2004, J. Cell Biol., 166, 487, 10.1083/jcb.200401141 · DOI
  38. Kyuuma, 2007, Cell Struct. Funct., 31, 159, 10.1247/csf.06023 · DOI
  39. Ma, 2007, J. Biol. Chem., 282, 9805, 10.1074/jbc.M611635200 · DOI
  40. Herrera-Vigenor, 2006, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 347, 924, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.06.169 · DOI
  41. Reyes-Ibarra, 2007, Mol. Endocrinol., 21, 1394, 10.1210/me.2006-0523 · DOI
  42. Hislop, 2009, J. Biol. Chem., 284, 19361, 10.1074/jbc.M109.001644 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Hasdemir, 2009, J. Biol. Chem., 284, 28453, 10.1074/jbc.M109.025692 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Tanaka, 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 19129, 10.1074/jbc.274.27.19129 · DOI
  45. McCullough, 2006, Curr. Biol., 16, 160, 10.1016/j.cub.2005.11.073 · DOI
  46. Zamborlini, 2006, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 103, 19140, 10.1073/pnas.0603788103 · DOI
  47. Tsang, 2006, Genomics, 88, 333, 10.1016/j.ygeno.2006.04.003 · DOI
  48. Row, 2006, J. Biol. Chem., 281, 12618, 10.1074/jbc.M512615200 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Row, 2007, J. Biol. Chem., 282, 30929, 10.1074/jbc.M704009200 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Nakamura, 2006, Genes Cells, 11, 593, 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2006.00963.x · DOI
  51. Kikuchi, 2003, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 306, 637, 10.1016/S0006-291X(03)01009-X · DOI
  52. Kim, 2006, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 351, 612, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.10.068 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Hu, 2003, Nat. Biotechnol., 21, 539, 10.1038/nbt816 · DOI
  54. Hu, 2002, Mol. Cell, 9, 789, 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00496-3 · DOI
  55. Moffat, 2006, Cell, 124, 1283, 10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.040 · DOI
  56. Berry, 2002, Curr. Biol., 12, 1336, 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01038-2 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Abramoff, 2004, Biophotonics Int., 11, 36
  58. Frank, 1992, Tetrahedron, 48, 9217, 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)85612-X · DOI
  59. Liu, 2003, Mol. Cell, 11, 471, 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00046-7 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Harkiolaki, 2003, EMBO J., 22, 2571, 10.1093/emboj/cdg258 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Raiborg, 2009, Nature, 458, 445, 10.1038/nature07961 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Acconcia, 2009, Exp. Cell Res., 315, 1610, 10.1016/j.yexcr.2008.10.014 · DOI
  63. Komada, 2005, J Biochem., 137, 1, 10.1093/jb/mvi001 · DOI
  64. Feng, 1994, Science, 266, 1241, 10.1126/science.7526465 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Raiborg, 2002, Nat. Cell Biol., 4, 394, 10.1038/ncb791 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Urbé, 2003, J. Cell Sci., 116, 4169, 10.1242/jcs.00723 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Mizuno, 2003, Mol. Biol. Cell, 14, 3675, 10.1091/mbc.e02-12-0823 · DOI
  68. Raiborg, 2002, Cell Struct. Funct., 27, 403, 10.1247/csf.27.403 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sierra, M. I., Wright, M. H., & Nash, P. D.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
285
Issue
18
Pages
13990-14004
ISSN
0021-9258
Cited by
66
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review