The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The MIT Domain of UBPY Constitutes a CHMP Binding and Endosomal Localization Signal Required for Efficient Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Degradation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The N-terminal DUF1873 of USP8 constitutes a structurally atypical MIT domain.
“The N-terminal domain of unknown function (DUF) 1873 of USP8 reportedly constitutes a structurally atypical low homology microtubule interacting and transport (MIT) domain (32,33)”
From Regulation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Ubiquitination and Trafficking by the USP8·STAM Complex (2010) · cites this paper as [32]
The MIT domain of USP8 interacts in vitro with CHMP-1A/B components of ESCRT-III.
“which has been shown to interact in vitro with the CHMP-1A/B protein components of the late endosomal sorting complex, ESCRT-III.”
From Regulation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Ubiquitination and Trafficking by the USP8·STAM Complex (2010) · cites this paper as [32]
The MIT domain likely constitutes a late endosomal localization determinant irrelevant to the early phase of EGFR trafficking directly controlled by USP8.
“As the MIT domain reportedly interacts with the ESCRT-III proteins (32), it likely constitutes a late endosomal localization determinant irrelevant to the early phase of EGFR trafficking directly controlled by USP8.”
From Regulation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Ubiquitination and Trafficking by the USP8·STAM Complex (2010) · cites this paper as [32]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 51
- Shtiegman, 2003, Semin. Cancer Biol., 13, 29, 10.1016/S1044-579X(02)00097-4 · DOI
- Polo, 2004, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 16, 156, 10.1016/j.ceb.2004.02.003 · DOI
- Hicke, 2003, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol., 19, 141, 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.110701.154617 · DOI
- Urbe, 2005, Essays Biochem., 41, 81, 10.1042/bse0410081 · DOI
- Katzmann, 2002, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 3, 893, 10.1038/nrm973 · DOI · Paper page
- Rothman, 1986, Cell, 47, 1041, 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90819-6 · DOI
- Raymond, 1992, Mol. Biol. Cell, 3, 1389, 10.1091/mbc.3.12.1389 · DOI
- Bowers, 2004, Traffic, 5, 194, 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2004.00169.x · DOI
- von Schwedler, 2003, Cell, 114, 701, 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00714-1 · DOI
- Williams, 2007, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 8, 355, 10.1038/nrm2162 · DOI
- Martin-Serrano, 2003, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 100, 12414, 10.1073/pnas.2133846100 · DOI
- Raiborg, 2002, Nature Cell Biol., 4, 394, 10.1038/ncb791 · DOI · Paper page
- Sachse, 2002, Mol. Biol. Cell, 13, 1313, 10.1091/mbc.01-10-0525 · DOI · Paper page
- Bilodeau, 2002, Nat. Cell Biol., 4, 534, 10.1038/ncb815 · DOI
- Clague, 2002, Curr. Biol., 12, R529, 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01030-8 · DOI
- Hurley, 2006, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct., 35, 277, 10.1146/annurev.biophys.35.040405.102126 · DOI · Paper page
- Howard, 2001, J. Cell Sci., 114, 2395, 10.1242/jcs.114.13.2395 · DOI
- Amerik, 2000, Mol. Biol. Cell, 11, 3365, 10.1091/mbc.11.10.3365 · DOI
- Nickerson, 2006, J. Cell Biol., 175, 715, 10.1083/jcb.200606113 · DOI
- Horii, 2006, Biochem. J., 400, 23, 10.1042/BJ20060897 · DOI
- Kranz, 2001, Mol. Biol. Cell, 12, 711, 10.1091/mbc.12.3.711 · DOI
- Nijman, 2005, Cell, 123, 773, 10.1016/j.cell.2005.11.007 · DOI · Paper page
- Scheel, H. (2005) Comparative Analysis of the Ubiquitin-Proteasome System in Homo sapiens and Saccharomyces cerevisiase, Ph.D thesis, University of Cologne
- Kato, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 37481, 10.1074/jbc.M007251200 · DOI · Paper page
- Tanaka, 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 19129, 10.1074/jbc.274.27.19129 · DOI
- Clague, 2006, Trends Cell Biol., 16, 551, 10.1016/j.tcb.2006.09.002 · DOI · Paper page
- McCullough, 2004, J. Cell Biol., 166, 487, 10.1083/jcb.200401141 · DOI
- Bowers, 2006, J. Biol. Chem., 281, 5094, 10.1074/jbc.M508632200 · DOI · Paper page
- Row, 2006, J. Biol. Chem., 281, 12618, 10.1074/jbc.M512615200 · DOI · Paper page
- Mizuno, 2006, Traffic, 7, 1017, 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2006.00452.x · DOI
- Alwan, 2007, J. Biol. Chem., 282, 1658, 10.1074/jbc.M604711200 · DOI · Paper page
- Yoshimori, 2000, Mol. Biol. Cell, 11, 747, 10.1091/mbc.11.2.747 · DOI
- Bishop, 2002, J. Cell Biol., 157, 91, 10.1083/jcb.200112080 · DOI
- Babst, 1998, EMBO J., 17, 2982, 10.1093/emboj/17.11.2982 · DOI
- Tsang, 2006, Genomics, 88, 333, 10.1016/j.ygeno.2006.04.003 · DOI
- Agromayor, 2006, J. Biol. Chem., 281, 23083, 10.1074/jbc.M513803200 · DOI
- Scott, 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 102, 13813, 10.1073/pnas.0502165102 · DOI
- Ciccarelli, 2003, Genomics, 81, 437, 10.1016/S0888-7543(03)00011-9 · DOI
- Maytal-Kivity, 2002, BMC Biochem., 3, 28, 10.1186/1471-2091-3-28 · DOI
- Whitley, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 38786, 10.1074/jbc.M306864200 · DOI
- Lehner, 2004, Genome Res., 14, 1315, 10.1101/gr.2122004 · DOI
- Row, 2005, Biochem. J., 389, 629, 10.1042/BJ20050067 · DOI
- Hammond, 2003, Mol. Biol. Cell, 14, 1346, 10.1091/mbc.e02-09-0578 · DOI
- McCullough, 2006, Curr. Biol., 16, 160, 10.1016/j.cub.2005.11.073 · DOI
- Mizuno, 2005, Mol. Biol. Cell, 16, 5163, 10.1091/mbc.e05-06-0560 · DOI · Paper page
- Reid, 2005, Hum. Mol. Genet., 14, 19, 10.1093/hmg/ddi003 · DOI
- Avvakumov, 2006, J. Biol. Chem., 281, 38061, 10.1074/jbc.M606704200 · DOI · Paper page
- Kyuuma, 2007, Cell Struct. Funct., 31, 159, 10.1247/csf.06023 · DOI
- Naviglio, 1998, EMBO J., 17, 3241, 10.1093/emboj/17.12.3241 · DOI · Paper page
- Amerik, 2006, J. Cell Biol., 175, 825, 10.1083/jcb.200605134 · DOI
- Richter, 2007, EMBO J., 26, 2454, 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601692 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Regulation and cellular roles of ubiquitin-specific deubiquitinating enzymes.
Reyes-Turcu, F. E., Ventii, K. H., & Wilkinson, K. D. (2009) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.082307.091526 · Cited by 1,396
Berlin, I., Schwartz, H., & Nash, P. D. (2010) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m109.016287 · Cited by 121
Scotti, E., Calamai, M., Goulbourne, C. N., Zhang, L., Hong, C., Lin, R. R., Choi, J., Pilch, P. F., Fong, L. G., Zou, P., et al. (2013) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.01716-12 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Row, P. E., Liu, H., Hayes, S., Welchman, R., Charalabous, P., Hofmann, K., Clague, M. J., Sanderson, C. M., & Urbé, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 282
- Issue
- 42
- Pages
- 30929-30937
- ISSN
- 0021-9258
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
