Cited by 163Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processesGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors

Retinoic Acid Receptors Recognize the Mouse Genome through Binding Elements with Diverse Spacing and Topology

Open access
Moutier, Emmanuel, Ye, Tao, Choukrallah, Mohamed-Amin, Urban, Sylvia, Osz, Judit, Chatagnon, Amandine, Delacroix, Laurence, Langer, Diana +4 more·2012·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Retinoic acid receptors (RARs) heterodimerize with retinoid X receptors (RXRs) and bind to RA response elements (RAREs) in the regulatory regions of their target genes. Although previous studies on limited sets of RA-regulated genes have defined canonical RAREs as direct repeats of the consensus RGKTCA separated by 1, 2, or 5 nucleotides (DR1, DR2, DR5), we show that in mouse embryoid bodies or F9 embryonal carcinoma cells, RARs occupy a large repertoire of sites with DR0, DR8, and IR0 (inverted repeat 0) elements. Recombinant RAR-RXR binds these non-canonical spacings in vitro with comparable affinities to DR2 and DR5. Most DR8 elements comprise three half-sites with DR2 and DR0 spacings. This specific half-site organization constitutes a previously unrecognized but frequent signature of RAR binding elements. In functional assays, DR8 and IR0 elements act as independent RAREs, whereas DR0 does not. Our results reveal an unexpected diversity in the spacing and topology of binding elements for the RAR-RXR heterodimer. The differential ability of RAR-RXR bound to DR0 compared to DR2, DR5, and DR8 to mediate RA-dependent transcriptional activation indicates that half-site spacing allosterically regulates RAR function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m112.361790

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent genome-wide ChIP-seq technology allowed the identification of new RAR-binding loci and expanded the repertoire of potential high-affinity response elements.

    “Most interestingly, the recent genome wide ChIP-seq (chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with deep sequencing) technology allowed the identifi cation of new RAR-binding loci and expanded the repertoire of potential high-affi nity response elements (80)(81)(82).”
  • RARs can occupy a larger repertoire of sites with noncanonical IR0, DR0, and DR8 spacing, most DR8 elements comprising three half-sites with DR2 and DR0 spacing.

    “They also revealed that RARs can occupy a larger repertoire of sites with noncanonical IR0 (inverted repeats), DR0, and DR8 spacing, most DR8 elements comprising three half-sites with DR2 and DR0 spacing ( 81 ) ( Fig. 3B ).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moutier, E., Ye, T., Choukrallah, M.-A., Urban, S., Osz, J., Chatagnon, A., Delacroix, L., Langer, D., Rochel, N., Moras, D., Benoit, G., & Davidson, I.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Friedrich Miescher Institute (CH)
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
  • University of Liège (BE)
Corresponding author
Davidson, Irwin
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
287
Issue
31
Pages
26328-26341
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149216452
Cited by
163
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • univOAK (4 institutions : Université de Strasbourg, Université de Haute Alsace, INSA Strasbourg, Bibliothèque Nationale et Universitaire de Strasbourg) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
  • Université de Strasbourg
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  • Institut National Du Cancer
  • Institute of Genetics
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors
Keywords
retinoic acid receptor, retinoid X receptor, retinoic acid response element, inverted repeats, RAR/RXR heterodimers, transcriptional activation, allosteric regulation, mouse genome, embryonal carcinoma cells, embryoid bodies
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Binding, Competitive, Cells, Cultured, Protein Binding, Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Transcription, Genetic, Consensus Sequence, Genome, Titrimetry, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Receptors, Retinoic Acid, Coculture Techniques, Response Elements, Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, Retinoid X Receptors, Mice, Embryoid Bodies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review