Cited by 317Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stressRedox biology and oxidative stressNuclear Receptors and Signaling

Nrf1 and Nrf2 Play Distinct Roles in Activation of Antioxidant Response Element-dependent Genes

Open access
Ohtsuji, Makiko, Katsuoka, Fumiki, Kobayashi, Akira, Aburatani, Hiroyuki, Hayes, John D., Yamamoto, Masayuki·2008·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Nrf1 is a member of the vertebrate Cap'n'Collar (CNC) transcription factor family that commonly contains a unique basic-leucine zipper domain. Among CNC family members, Nrf2 is known to regulate a battery of antioxidant and xenobiotic-metabolizing enzyme genes through the antioxidant response element (ARE). Although Nrf1 has also been shown to bind the ARE, it is unclear whether it plays a distinct role from Nrf2 in regulating genes with this element. To address this issue in vivo, we generated mice bearing a hepatocyte-specific disruption of the Nrf1 gene. AlthoughNrf2 knock-out mice did not exhibit liver damage when they were maintained in an unstressed condition, hepatocyte-specific deletion of Nrf1 caused liver damage resembling the human disease non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Gene expression analysis revealed that the disruption of Nrf1 causes stress that activates a number of ARE-driven genes in an Nrf2-dependent manner, indicating that Nrf2 cannot compensate completely for loss of Nrf1 function in the liver. In contrast, expression of metallothionein-1 and -2 (MT1 and MT2) genes, each of which harbors at least one ARE in its regulatory region, was decreased in the Nrf1-null mutant mice. Whereas Nrf1 and Nrf2 bound the MT1 ARE with comparable affinity, Nrf1 preferentially activated the reporter gene expression through the MT1 ARE. This study has, thus, identified the first ARE-dependent gene that relies exclusively on Nrf1, suggesting that it plays a distinct functional role in regulating ARE-driven genes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m804597200

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These factors, including nuclear respiratory factor 1, nuclear factor erythroid-2-like 2, GA binding protein (nuclear respiratory factor 2), and Sp4, directly and indirectly control the expression of respiratory chain subunits encoded by nuclear and mitochondrial DNA.

    “These factors, including nuclear respiratory factor 1, nuclear factor erythroid-2-like 2, GA binding protein (nuclear respiratory factor 2), and Sp4 [110–114] directly and indirectly control the expression of respiratory chain subunits encoded by nuclear and mitochondrial DNA [110, 115, 116].”

    From Neuronal Apolipoprotein E4 Expression Results in Proteome-Wide Alterations and Compromises Bioenergetic Capacity by Disrupting Mitochondrial Function (2019) · cites this paper as [111]

    The Abstract (page not available) identifies Nrf2 as a transcription factor that regulates antioxidant and xenobiotic-metabolizing genes, supporting its inclusion among the named factors. The paper does not establish that these factors control respiratory-chain subunits encoded by nuclear or mitochondrial DNA; searches for respiratory-chain and mitochondrial terms returned no such passage. Its Nrf1 is a Cap’n’Collar factor, not the nuclear respiratory factor 1 named in the claim. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several of the transcription factors identified are implicated in neurodegeneration, including nuclear respiratory factor 1, nuclear factor erythroid-2-like 2, ETS domain-containing protein Elk-1, Kruppel-like factor 14, and Sp4.

    “Additionally, several of the transcription factors identified are implicated in neurodegeneration, including nuclear respiratory factor 1 [117, 118], nuclear factor erythroid-2-like 2 [110, 111], ETS domain-containing protein Elk-1 [119], Kruppel-like factor 14 [120], and Sp4 [121].”

    From Neuronal Apolipoprotein E4 Expression Results in Proteome-Wide Alterations and Compromises Bioenergetic Capacity by Disrupting Mitochondrial Function (2019) · cites this paper as [111]

    The Abstract and Discussion describe Nrf1 and Nrf2 in antioxidant-gene regulation and mouse liver pathology, but the passages do not link either factor to neurodegeneration. A search for neurodegenerative disease and neuronal terms found no passage establishing that link. The paper’s CNC-family Nrf1 should also not be assumed to mean nuclear respiratory factor 1. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Xu, Z., Chen, L., Leung, L., Yen, T. S. B., Lee, C., and Chan, J. Y. (2005) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102, 4120 -4125
  2. Beattie, J. H., Wood, A. M., Newman, A. M., Bremner, I., Choo, K. H. A., Michalska, A. E., Duncan, J. S., and Trayhurn, P. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 358 -363

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ohtsuji, M., Katsuoka, F., Kobayashi, A., Aburatani, H., Hayes, J. D., & Yamamoto, M.
Affiliations
  • Tohoku University (JP)
  • Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • University of Dundee (GB)
Corresponding author
Yamamoto, Masayuki
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-11
Volume
283
Issue
48
Pages
33554-33562
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007143913
Cited by
317
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 15
FWCI
4.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (publishedVersion)
  • Terrestrial Environment Research Center (University of Tsukuba) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Japan Science and Technology Agency
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nuclear Receptors and Signaling
Keywords
NRF1, Nrf2, antioxidant response element, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, metallothionein-1, metallothionein-2, liver injury, transcriptional activation
MeSH terms
Animals, Antioxidants, Fatty Liver, Gene Expression Regulation, Hepatitis, Metallothionein, Leucine Zippers, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Mice, Knockout, Response Elements, Hepatocytes, Nuclear Respiratory Factor 1, NF-E2-Related Factor 2, Mice, Gene Knockdown Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review