Cited by 55Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorFree Will and Agency

5. Self-regulation by the medial frontal cortex: Limbic representation of motive set-points

Luu, Phan, Tucker, Don M.·2004·Advances in Consciousness Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1075/aicr.54.07luu

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-regulation in the individual is understood developmentally as a cybernetic, self-regulating system that adjusts in response to experience.

    “self-regulation in the individual is understood developmentally as a cybernetic, self-regulating system that adjusts in response to experience”

    From School Readiness and Self-Regulation: A Developmental Psychobiological Approach (2015) · cites this paper as Luu & Tucker 2004

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luu, P., & Tucker, D. M.
Venue
Advances in Consciousness Research
Published
2004-01-22
Pages
123-162
ISSN
1381-589X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2498368121
Cited by
55
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.94
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advances in consciousness research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
Keywords
self-regulation, medial frontal cortex, prefrontal cortex, consciousness, self-control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review