Cited by 271Developmental and Educational NeuropsychologyChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentCognitive Abilities and Testing

Developmental science and executive function

Open access
Blair, Clancy·2016·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

Executive function abilities, including working memory, inhibitory control, and the flexible volitional shifting of the focus of attention, provide a foundation for reflection on experience, reasoning, and the purposeful regulation of behavior. These abilities and their underlying neurobiology, however, are inherently malleable and influenced by characteristics of individuals and contexts. Implications of this malleability for research on the development of executive function in early childhood, for the prospect that these abilities can be fostered and promoted by specific types of activities, and for issues relating to the reliable and valid measurement of executive function are considered.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0963721415622634

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Schickedanz J Dickinson D Opening the world of learning 2005 Pearson Iowa City, IA
  2. Wilson S Farran D Experimental evaluation of the Tools of the Mind curriculum 8 3 2012 Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness Spring Conference Washington, DC

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blair, C.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Blair, Clancy
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2016-02
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
3-7
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2324183210
Cited by
271
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6
FWCI
32.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01HD039667, R01HD051502)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
executive function, working memory, inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility, early childhood development, neuroplasticity, assessment validity and reliability, cognitive development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review