Chapter 1. Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance
Abstract
This chapter provides an overview of pedagogic and theoretical issues that have motivated recent research into second language task complexity. The first two sections describe how procedures for task analysis, and decisions about task complexity, can be accommodated in task-based language teaching program design. The third section describes a componential framework for analysing task demands. This framework distinguishes between cognitive factors contributing to Task Complexity, interactive factors involved in performing tasks under various Task Conditions, and the learner factors affecting perceptions of Task Difficulty. The fourth section describes five ancillary predictions the Cognition Hypothesis makes about how increasing task complexity leads to measurable increases in task-based learning and performance. The final sections describe how studies of these predictions have typically been measured, to date, and a rationale for investigating the effects on task-based learning of individual differences in learners’ cognitive abilities and affective dispositions. The chapter concludes by briefly summarising the organization of the chapters in this book and the empirical findings they report.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Robinson (2011) conflates design and implementation in his Cognition Hypothesis.
“Robinson (2011), however, conflates the two in his Cognition Hypothesis.”
From Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward (2017) · cites this paper as Robinson (2011)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Interaction and instructed second language acquisition
Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444818000125 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
In Defense of Tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and Real Issues
Long, M. H. (2016) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190515000057 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward
Ellis, R. (2017) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444817000179 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Towards a modular language curriculum for using tasks
Ellis, R. (2019) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168818765315 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Rahimi, M., & Zhang, L. J. (2019) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-018-9887-9 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
- Authors
- Robinson, P.
- Affiliations
- Aoyama Gakuin University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Robinson, Peter
- Venue
- Task-Based Language Teaching
- Publisher
- John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Published
- 2011-09-02
- Pages
- 3-38
- ISSN
- 1877-346X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2227556501
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 101.87
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Task-based language teaching (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Keywords
- Cognition Hypothesis, task analysis, task-based language learning, task performance, perceived difficulty, affective dispositions, individual differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review