CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 151Nutrition, Health, and Society StudiesHealthcare Systems and Public HealthGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Part III. Can we turn back the clock or modify the adverse dynamics? Programme and policy issues: Influencing public nutrition for non-communicable disease prevention: from community intervention to national programme – experiences from Finland

Open access
Pekka, Puska, Pirjo, Pietinen, Ulla, Uusitalo·2002·Public Health Nutrition
DOI 10.1079/phn2001300
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

A global health transition is currently underway. The burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) is increasing rapidly in the developing world, very much as a result of changes in lifestyles. In addition to changes in tobacco use and physical activity, major changes are taking place in diets, contributing greatly to the growing epidemic of NCD. Thus, a huge global public health challenge is how to influence the trends in diet and nutrition for effective global NCD prevention. The health transition took place rapidly in Finland after World War II and mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD) was exceptionally high. The North Karelia Project was launched in 1972 as a community-based, and later as a national, programme to influence diet and other lifestyles that are crucial in the prevention of CVD. The intervention had a strong theory base and it employed comprehensive strategies. Broad community organisation and the strong participation of people were the key elements. Evaluation has shown how the diet (particularly fat consumption) has changed and how these changes have led to a major reduction in population serum cholesterol and blood pressure levels. It has also shown how ischaemic heart disease mortality in a working-age population has declined by 73% in North Karelia and by 65% in the whole country from 1971 to 1995. Although Finland is an industrialised country, North Karelia was rural, of rather low socio-economic level and with many social problems in the 1970s and 1980s. The project was based on low-cost intervention activities, where people's participation and community organisations played a key role. Comprehensive interventions in the community were eventually supported by national activities – from expert guidelines and media activities to industry collaboration and policy. Similar principles for nutrition intervention programmes could be used in developing countries, obviously tailored to the local conditions. This paper discusses the experiences of the North Karelia Project in the light of needs from the less-industrialised countries and makes some general recommendations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1079/phn2001300

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 30 references

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Helakorpi, 1998, Health Behaviour Among Finnish Adult Population
  2. Hasunen, 1998, The Food Consumption and Nutrient Intake in Finland from 1969 to 1972
  3. Puska, 1981, The North Karelia Project: Evaluation of a Comprehensive Community Programme for Control of Cardiovascular Diseases in North Karelia, Finland 1972–1977
  4. 1990, Diet, Nutrition, and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases
  5. Helakorpi, 1995, The North Karelia Project. 20 Year Results and Experiences, 141
  6. 1999, Nutrition in Finland
  7. Pietinen, 1995, The North Karelia Project. 20 Year Results and Experiences, 107

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Pekka, P., Pirjo, P., & Ulla, U.
Affiliations
World Health Organization (CH)
Corresponding author
Pekka, Puska
Venue
Public Health Nutrition
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2002-02
Volume
5
Issue
1a
Pages
245-251
ISSN
  • 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2727
DOI
10.1079/phn2001300
OpenAlex
W2111279212
Cited by
151
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
14.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 1785 d)
Locations
  • Public Health Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Nutrition, Health, and Society Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Healthcare Systems and Public Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Keywords
North Karelia Project, non-communicable diseases, cardiovascular disease prevention, dietary fat reduction, community-based intervention, population-based prevention, ischemic heart disease mortality, serum cholesterol, blood pressure, lifestyle modification, nutrition policy, developing countries, community participation, tobacco use, physical activity
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Chronic Disease, Community Health Services, Diet, Female, Finland, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, National Health Programs, Risk Factors, Nutrition Policy, Health Transition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review