Residency and Movement of Juvenile Chinook Salmon at Multiple Spatial Scales in a Tidal Marsh of the Columbia River Estuary
Abstract
Use of the Columbia River estuary by juvenile Pacific salmon Oncorhynchus spp. is garnering more attention as managers look to improve salmon survival through estuary restoration. Studies have shown that juvenile salmon are abundant in shallow‐water habitats within the Columbia River estuary, but information on how juveniles exploit specific estuarine habitats is lacking. We used a combination of physical marks and PIT tag technology to record residence time, movement, and growth of juvenile Chinook Salmon O. tshawytscha, particularly subyearlings, within an emergent marsh of the Columbia River estuary during 2005, 2006, and 2008. We documented marsh‐scale residency and movement within the marsh complex and channel‐scale residency and movement within two small secondary channels. Many juvenile Chinook Salmon remained in the marsh for 2–4 weeks and increased in FL by 10–20 mm, with an average growth rate of 0.53 mm/d. Chinook Salmon entered secondary channels most frequently in late afternoon and occasionally did so against the tide. Our results indicate that subyearling Chinook Salmon take advantage of shallow estuarine habitat in the Columbia River to a greater extent than previously documented. Received January 8, 2016; accepted March 21, 2016 Published online June 21, 2016
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Franz Lake and Campbell Slough have higher fish diversity and richness, driven by introduced species that are tolerant of warm temperatures and low dissolved oxygen.
“Franz Lake and Campbell Slough have higher fish diversity and richness, driven by introduced species that are tolerant of warm temperatures and low dissolved oxygen [21].”
From Subyearling Chinook salmon diets in Lower Columbia River estuarine habitats (2025) · cites this paper as [21]
Juvenile Chinook use emergent marsh habitat for multiple weeks, growing 0.53 mm/day, re-entering the same habitats after vacating them during ebb tides.
“[21] found juvenile Chinook use emergent marsh habitat for multiple weeks, growing 0.53 mm/day, re-entering the same habitats after vacating them during ebb tides.”
From Subyearling Chinook salmon diets in Lower Columbia River estuarine habitats (2025) · cites this paper as [21]
Re-entry indicates foraging-related movement patterns, as salmon use secondary channels against outgoing tides during peak emergence times of prey insects.
“Re-entry indicates foraging-related movement patterns, as salmon use secondary channels against outgoing tides during peak emergence times of prey insects [21].”
From Subyearling Chinook salmon diets in Lower Columbia River estuarine habitats (2025) · cites this paper as [21]
Cites
JUVENILE PACIFIC SALMON IN ESTUARIES: THE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM
Healey, M. C. (1982) · Estuarine Comparisons · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-404070-0.50025-9 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Levings, C. D., McAllister, C. D., & Chang, B. D. (1986) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f86-172 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Roegner, G. C., Dawley, E. W., Russell, M., Whiting, A., & Teel, D. J. (2010) · Transactions of the American Fisheries Society · doi:10.1577/t09-082.1 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Harnish, R. A., Johnson, G. E., McMichael, G. A., Hughes, M. S., & Ebberts, B. D. (2012) · Transactions of the American Fisheries Society · doi:10.1080/00028487.2012.670576 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Roegner, G. C., McNatt, R., Teel, D. J., & Bottom, D. L. (2012) · Marine and Coastal Fisheries · doi:10.1080/19425120.2012.675982 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Estuary ecosystem restoration: implementing and institutionalizing adaptive management
Ebberts, B. D., Zelinsky, B. D., Karnezis, J. P., Studebaker, C. A., Lopez‐Johnston, S., Creason, A. M., Krasnow, L., Johnson, G. E., & Thom, R. M. (2018) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1111/rec.12562 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Weitkamp, L. A., Beckman, B. R., Van Doornik, D. M., Munguia, A., Hunsicker, M., & Journey, M. (2022) · Transactions of the American Fisheries Society · doi:10.1002/tafs.10376 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Subyearling Chinook salmon diets in Lower Columbia River estuarine habitats
Accola, K., Cordell, J., Oxborrow, B., Toft, J. D., Suzumura, A., & Grote, J. (2025) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0325939 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- McNatt, R. A., Bottom, D. L., & Hinton, S. A.
- Affiliations
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
- Corresponding author
- McNatt, Regan A.
- ORCID
- Bottom, Daniel L.
- Venue
- Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-06-21
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 774-785
- ISSN
- 0002-8487 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-8659
- OpenAlex
- W2474863796
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 1.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transactions of the American Fisheries Society (publishedVersion)
- NOAA Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Funders
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
- Keywords
- juvenile Chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, estuarine habitat use, tidal marshes, residence time, movement behavior, growth rate, secondary channels, estuary restoration, Columbia River estuary, PIT tagging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review