Cited by 36Malaria Research and ControlPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Malarial infection and birthweight in urban Zanzibar, Tanzania

Matteelli, A., Donato, F., Shein, A., Muchi, J. A., Abass, A. K., Mariani, M., Leopardi, O., Maxwell, C. A. +1 more·1996·Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology

Abstract

In urban Zanzibar, Tanzania, 389 women with full-term pregnancies were studied to see what effect their infection with malaria (at delivery) had on the birthweight (BW) of their infants. The overall prevalence of low birthweight (LBW) (i.e. < 2500 g) was 3.9% (15 out of 389). Overall, 21.3% (82/384) of the women only had peripheral parasitaemias at delivery, 17.6% (58/329) only had active placental infections and 47.9% (157/328) had both. The youngest women (< 20 years), the primiparae and those with Plasmodium infection gave birth to neonates with relatively low mean BW. The lowest mean BW (2967 g) was found among the offspring of women with active placental infection (N = 58). The women with past/chronic infection (N = 73) or no infection (N = 201) generally produced heavier infants, with mean BW of 3242 and 3338 g, respectively. The women with active placental infection were also far more likely to have babies of LBW (15.5%) than those with past/chronic infection (1.4%) or no infection (1.5%). Multivariate analysis indicated that the highest relative risk of LBW (10.1, with a 95% confidence interval of 2.9-35.4) was associated with active placental infection, with no significant difference between primiparae and multiparae. In the study population, therefore, with its low prevalence of LBW, malaria infection increased the risk of LBW in full-term neonates by about 10-fold, with a population-attributable proportion of 55.4%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00034983.1996.11813036

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other reviews suggest the same statistically significant association between malaria in pregnancy and low birthweight.

    “This is validated by other reviews conducted that suggest the same statistically significant association between malaria in pregnancy and low birthweight of the baby [25].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matteelli, A., Donato, F., Shein, A., Muchi, J. A., Abass, A. K., Mariani, M., Leopardi, O., Maxwell, C. A., & Carosi, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Brescia (IT)
  • Ospedale Maggiore di Lodi (IT)
Venue
Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology
Published
1996-01
Volume
90
Issue
2
Pages
125-134
ISSN
  • 0003-4983 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-8594
OpenAlex
W2255401135
Cited by
36
References
22
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
malaria, birth weight, low birth weight, placental malaria, pregnancy, neonatal outcomes, primiparous women, chronic malaria infection
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Anemia, Birth Weight, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Infant, Low Birth Weight, Infant, Newborn, Malaria, Parity, Placenta Diseases, Pregnancy, Tanzania, Urban Health, Pregnancy Complications, Parasitic, Prevalence, Multivariate Analysis, Parasitemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review