Cited by 16Psychedelics and Drug StudiesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

A quantitative exploration of the relationships between regular yoga practice, microdosing psychedelics, wellbeing and personality variables

Open access
Bright, Stephen, Gringart, Eyal, Blatchford, Emily, Bettinson, Samantha·2021·Australian Journal of Psychology

Abstract

Objective: The current study aimed to explore whether the subjective effects of microdosing psychedelics are comparable to those of yoga in relation to psychological wellbeing, depression, anxiety and stress. It also explored the relationship between yoga, microdosing and personality.Method: The sample comprised 339 participants, yoga (n = 131), microdose (n = 69), microdose and yoga (n = 54) and control (n = 85). All completed measures of personality (M5-50 and Tellegen Absorption Scale), mood (Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21) and wellbeing (Ryff Scales of Psychological Wellbeing).Results: The yoga and microdosing groups scored significantly higher on psychological wellbeing and absorption than the control. The microdosing and yoga group had lower depression scores than the microdose only group, and lower anxiety scores than the yoga only group. Furthermore, the microdosing and yoga group had the highest absorption score. Openness was significantly lower in the control group than in all other groups.Conclusions: While we cannot infer that yoga and microdosing lead to increased wellbeing, openness and absorption, or to decreased depression and anxiety, the findings suggest that the subjective effects of microdosing psychedelics are comparable to those of yoga and that the combination of both might be beneficial.KEY POINTSWhat is already known about this topic: (1) Yoga often leads to improved psychological wellbeing, decreased depressive and anxiety symptoms, decrease…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00049530.2021.1882266

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bright, S., Gringart, E., Blatchford, E., & Bettinson, S.
Affiliations
Edith Cowan University (AU)
Corresponding author
Blatchford, Emily
Venue
Australian Journal of Psychology
Published
2021-03-01
Volume
73
Issue
2
Pages
134-143
ISSN
  • 0004-9530 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-9536
OpenAlex
W3134742026
Cited by
16
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Australian Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
yoga, psychedelic microdosing, psychological well-being, depression, anxiety, stress, personality traits, openness to experience, absorption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review