Cited by 14Psychedelics and Drug StudiesParanormal Experiences and BeliefsPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Exploring the relationship between microdosing, personality and emotional insight: a prospective study

Open access
Dressler, Hannah M., Bright, Stephen J., Polito, Vince·2021·Journal of Psychedelic Studies

Abstract

Abstract Backround and aims Having entered the recent public and research zeitgeist, microdosing involves consuming sub-perceptual doses of psychedelic drugs, allegedly to enhance performance, creativity, and wellbeing. The results of research to date have been mixed. Whereas most studies have reported positive impacts of microdosing, some microdosers have also reported adverse effects. In addition, research to date has revealed inconsistent patterns of change in personality traits. This prospective study explored the relationship between microdosing, personality change, and emotional awareness. Methods Measures of personality and alexithymia were collected at two time points. 76 microdosers participated at baseline. Invitations to a follow-up survey were sent out after 31 days, and 24 participants were retained. Results Conscientiousness increased, while neuroticism decreased across these time points ( n = 24). At baseline ( N = 76), neuroticism was associated with alexithymia. In addition, neuroticism correlated negatively with duration of prior microdosing experience, and extraversion correlated positively with both duration of prior microdosing experience and lifetime number of microdoses. Conclusion These results suggest that microdosing might have an impact on otherwise stable personality traits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1556/2054.2021.00157

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Valentish, J. (2018). Why professionals are taking psychedelic drugs in the workplace.Australian Financial Review. https://www.afr. com/life-and-luxury/arts-and-culture/why-professionals-are- taking-psychedelic-drugs-20181205-h18r0w.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dressler, H. M., Bright, S. J., & Polito, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Göttingen (DE)
  • Edith Cowan University (AU)
  • Macquarie University (AU)
Corresponding author
Polito, Vince
Venue
Journal of Psychedelic Studies
Published
2021-05-11
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
9-16
ISSN
2559-9283 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3149676623
Cited by
14
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychedelic Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
microdosing, personality change, emotional awareness, alexithymia, neuroticism, conscientiousness, extraversion, psychedelics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review