Cited by 235Psychedelics and Drug StudiesParanormal Experiences and BeliefsPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

A systematic study of microdosing psychedelics

Open access
Polito, Vince, Stevenson, Richard J.·2019·PLoS ONE

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The phenomenon of 'microdosing', that is, regular ingestion of very small quantities of psychedelic substances, has seen a rapid explosion of popularity in recent years. Individuals who microdose report minimal acute effects from these substances yet claim a range of long-term general health and wellbeing benefits. There have been no published empirical studies of microdosing and the current legal and bureaucratic climate makes direct empirical investigation of the effects of psychedelics difficult. In Study One we conducted a systematic, observational investigation of individuals who microdose. We tracked the experiences of 98 microdosing participants, who provided daily ratings of psychological functioning over a six week period. 63 of these additionally completed a battery of psychometric measures tapping mood, attention, wellbeing, mystical experiences, personality, creativity, and sense of agency, at baseline and at completion of the study. Analyses of daily ratings revealed a general increase in reported psychological functioning across all measures on dosing days but limited evidence of residual effects on following days. Analyses of pre and post study measures revealed reductions in reported levels of depression and stress; lower levels of distractibility; increased absorption; and increased neuroticism. To better understand these findings, in Study Two we investigated pre-existing beliefs and expectations about the effects of microdosing in a sample of 263 naïve and experienced microdosers, so as to gauge expectancy bias. All participants believed that microdosing would have large and wide-ranging benefits in contrast to the limited outcomes reported by actual microdosers. Notably, the effects believed most likely to change were unrelated to the observed pattern of reported outcomes. The current results suggest that dose controlled empirical research on the impacts of microdosing on mental health and attentional capabilities are needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0211023

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [15]Grof S. Varieties of transpersonal experiences: Observations from LSD psychotherapy. The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology. 1972; 4: 45.
  2. [25]Camps R. Cosmetic Consciousness: Cross-sectional exploration of the microdosing community and empirical examination of anecdotal benefits [Internet]. 2017. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319442972_Cosmetic_Consciousness_Cross-sectional_exploration_of_the_microdosing_community_and_empirical_examination_of_anecdotal_benefits
  3. [52]Nichols D. Psychedelics Pharmacol Rev. 2016; 68: 264– 355. 10.1124/pr.115.011478 26841800 PMC4813425 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [81]Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H. A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2013; 4: 133– 142. doi: 10/f4pkjx

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Polito, V., & Stevenson, R. J.
Affiliations
Macquarie University (AU)
Corresponding author
Polito, Vince
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2019-02-06
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
e0211023
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2895986834
Cited by
235
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 1
FWCI
34.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
microdosing, psychedelics, psychological functioning, mood, depression, stress, attention, distractibility, absorption, neuroticism, creativity, mystical experience, sense of agency, expectancy bias, mental health, well-being
MeSH terms
Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Adult, Attention, Culture, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Hallucinogens, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Personality, Psychometrics, Empirical Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review