Cited by 40Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionWorkplace Violence and BullyingLegal Issues in Education

The power of the word: students’ and school staff’s use of the established bullying definition.

Open access
Eriksen, Ingunn Marie·2018·Educational Research

Abstract

BackgroundPrevious research has found that bullying is often defined differently by students, staff and researchers, leading researchers to call for a more consistent use of the term in practice to enable better intervention and measurement. However, little is known about the consequences of a more consistent use of the term in school.PurposeThe article examines the consequences of schools adopting an exact definition of bullying.SampleTwenty Norwegian primary and lower secondary schools were selected from a survey (n = 455). The schools were characterised by a strong culture of bullying prevention, and their staff and students knew and used the same authoritative bullying definition. Four schools were then selected for closer ethnographic study.Design and methodsInterviews were conducted with students, teachers, support staff and school management. The interviews were analysed qualitatively, using a grounded theory approach.ResultsFor school staff, the term ‘bullying’ was construed as rigid and possessing an inherent power that is manifested through the way the term controls adults’ actions. Teachers viewed students’ use of the term as too wide. They emphasised the need to teach students the established definition, as students’ overuse of the term may lead to the word’s diminishing impact for those who are in real need of help. Nevertheless, many of the educators stated that few students report bullying. Both school staff and students displayed a sense of certainty when identifying what counts as bullying. Students’ recognition of the power of the word was apparent in the way they used the term as a tool for social positioning.ConclusionsBy way of the status of a bullying definition as an established, research-based definition, it gains a potent power for management, teachers and students. Its power lies in the fact that the use of the term gives rights and responsibilities, determines guilt and confers blame and status. Unwanted effects of a strict control of the bullying term may involve the risk of missing cases and the risk that students use the term as a tool in the power relations between the students themselves.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00131881.2018.1454263

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eriksen, I. M.
Affiliations
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO)
Corresponding author
Eriksen, Ingunn Marie
Venue
Educational Research
Published
2018-04-03
Volume
60
Issue
2
Pages
157-170
ISSN
  • 0013-1881 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5847
OpenAlex
W2796299499
Cited by
40
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4
FWCI
6.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Educational Research (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Issues in Education
Keywords
definition of bullying, bullying prevention, school bullying, power of the word, social positioning, teacher perceptions, school staff, bullying reporting, primary and lower secondary schools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review