The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antecedents of proactive supply chain risk management – a contingency theory perspective
Open accessAbstract
Since supplier insolvencies are a major source of supply chain disruptions, scholars have continuously suggested managing supply chain risk management (SCRM) proactively in order to avoid their occurrence. However, business practice seems to fail with this task. This paper investigates antecedents which foster proactive SCRM implementation from a contingency theory perspective. As a major contingency we choose past supplier insolvencies as an indicator for the level of vulnerability of organisations and investigate inter-organisational, intra-organisational, and individual antecedents. By consulting supply chain management and management accounting literature, hypotheses are developed and tested via content analysis in 63 interviews with representatives from the automotive industry. The findings demonstrate that a mechanistic management control system, a rational cognitive style and relational buyer–supplier relationships have positive impacts on proactively managing supplier insolvency risks. Furthermore, past experience with supplier insolvencies has a moderating, though not a direct, effect on proactiveness. This research suggests that a holistic risk management approach is required to proactively mitigate supplier insolvency risk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
FINANCIAL RATIOS, DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS AND THE PREDICTION OF CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY
Altman, E. I. (1968) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00843.x · Cited by 14,888
International Organization for Standardization
(2011) · SpringerReference · doi:10.1007/springerreference_16847 · Cited by 12,534
Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness
Uzzi, B. (1997) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393808 · Cited by 9,670
Developing buyer-seller relationships
Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298705100202 · Cited by 9,139
Weber, R. (1990) · doi:10.4135/9781412983488 · Cited by 7,750
Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Jick, T. D. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392366 · Cited by 7,103 · cited 2×
“tionnaire for triangulation purposes was sent out via email (Jick 1979).”
Cited by
Hohenstein, N.-O., Feisel, E., Hartmann, E., & Giunipero, L. (2015) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-05-2013-0128 · Cited by 848
Spieske, A., & Birkel, H. (2021) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2021.107452 · Cited by 499
Supply chain readiness, response and recovery for resilience
Chowdhury, M. M. H., & Quaddus, M. (2016) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-12-2015-0463 · Cited by 401
Sreedevi, R., & Saranga, H. (2017) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.07.024 · Cited by 398
Antecedents and dimensions of supply chain robustness: a systematic literature review
Durach, C. F., Wieland, A., & Machuca, J. A. D. (2015) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-05-2013-0133 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Grötsch, V. M., Blome, C., & Schleper, M. C.
- Venue
- International Journal of Production Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-02-26
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2842-2867
- ISSN
- 0020-7543 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-588X
- OpenAlex
- W3122256822
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 103
- FWCI
- 31.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antecedents of proactive supply chain risk management – a contingency theory perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00207543.2012.746796
- The paper
- Grötsch, V. M., Blome, C., & Schleper, M. C. (2013). Antecedents of proactive supply chain risk management – a contingency theory perspective. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.746796
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.