Cited by 32Reflective Practices in EducationStudent Assessment and FeedbackInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

How Do Different Reflection Prompts Affect Engineering Students’ Academic Performance and Engagement?

Menekse, Muhsin, Anwar, Saira, Akdemir, Zeynep Gonca·2022·The Journal of Experimental Education

Abstract

This study explored the relative effectiveness of generic versus specific reflection prompts on engineering students’ academic performance and engagement with four scales (i.e., behavioral, emotional, social, cognitive). The sample consisted of 208 engineering students in two sections of a required first-year engineering course. By using a quasi-experimental research design in classroom settings, students in the specific and generic reflection prompt conditions were compared based on exams, project scores, and problem sets. Additionally, the role of reflection prompts in students’ behavioral, emotional, social, and cognitive engagements was investigated across conditions by using pre- and post-surveys administered at the beginning and end of the semester. Students in both conditions were asked to submit a total of 52 reflections during an academic semester. Results showed that students in the specific prompts condition performed significantly better on exams, total project score, and two problem sets than students in the generic prompts condition. In terms of engagement, results showed there was a significant decrease in behavioral, emotional, and cognitive scales for both conditions. On the other hand, for the social scale, while there was a decrease for students in generic prompts condition, there was an increase for the ones in specific prompts condition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00220973.2020.1786346

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Menekse, M., Anwar, S., & Akdemir, Z. G.
Affiliations
  • Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Venue
The Journal of Experimental Education
Published
2020-07-13
Volume
90
Issue
2
Pages
261-279
ISSN
  • 0022-0973 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-0683
OpenAlex
W3042284248
Cited by
32
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Experimental Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
reflection prompts, engineering students, academic performance, student engagement, behavioral engagement, emotional engagement, social engagement, cognitive engagement, first-year engineering courses, reflective writing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review