Cited by 232Reflective Practices in EducationInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsStudent Assessment and Feedback

Effects of elicited reflections combined with tutor or peer feedback on self-regulated learning and learning outcomes

Open access
van den Boom, Gerard, Paas, Fred, van Merriënboer, Jeroen J.G.·2007·Learning and Instruction

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.003

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combining reflective practices with input from both tutors and peers results in higher learning outcomes.

    “For instance, research by Van den Boom et al. (2007) suggests that combining reflective practices with input from both tutors and peers results in higher learning outcomes.”
  • The quality of peer feedback content can be further enriched when combined with feedback from other sources, such as tutors and automated systems employing AI and learning analytics.

    “Furthermore, the quality of peer feedback content can be further enriched when combined with feedback from other sources, such as tutors and automated systems employing AI and learning analytics (Banihashem et al., 2022; Farrokhnia et al., 2023; Van den Boom et al., 2007).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van den Boom, G., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G.
Affiliations
Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
Venue
Learning and Instruction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-10
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
532-548
ISSN
0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146443670
Cited by
232
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
20.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning and Instruction (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Keywords
student self-regulation, reflective learning, peer feedback, tutor feedback, learning outcomes, distance education, web-based learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review