Cited by 17Eating Disorders and BehaviorsBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Reactions to ideal body shapes

Prnjak, Katarina, Pemberton, Stephanie, Helms, Eric, Phillips, James G.·2020·The Journal of General Psychology

Abstract

Difficult-to-attain beauty standards that are promulgated by the media could contribute to body dissatisfaction, but their potential impact upon body image remains unclear. The present study examined reactions to thin-ideal and muscular-ideal images, and examined the effects of ideal image exposure on preferred body shape and time spent deliberating about ideal shape. In a 2 × 2 experimental design, 200 Internet users completed the Kessler psychological distress scale (K10) and were randomly assigned to view idealistic body images or houses (and rated them on semantic differential dimensions). Females viewed thin ideal images and males viewed muscular ideal images, while the control groups viewed images of houses. Between group measures analysis of variance revealed women reacted negatively to thinspirational images. Women were more driven for thinness and idealized a thinner shape for the female body than men. Psychologically distressed participants had a stronger drive for thinness and greater body dissatisfaction compared to low-distress participants. In addition, although beauty ideal imagery had no significant impact on males, females spent more time in choosing ideal body figure. Viewing thin bodies for females created a trend toward desiring a slimmer figure, as well as increased preoccupation with size as they spent more time deliberating over a photorealistic figure rating scale. Therefore, exposure to thinspiration promotes dissatisfaction with self and leads women to dwell more upon their body image.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00221309.2019.1676190

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prnjak, K., Pemberton, S., Helms, E., & Phillips, J. G.
Affiliations
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Corresponding author
Prnjak, Katarina
Venue
The Journal of General Psychology
Published
2019-10-12
Volume
147
Issue
4
Pages
361-380
ISSN
  • 0022-1309 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-0888
OpenAlex
W2979902209
Cited by
16
References
63
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of General Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
thin ideal, muscular ideal, body image, body dissatisfaction, thinspiration, psychological distress, sex differences, ideal body shape
MeSH terms
Attentional Bias, Adolescent, Adult, Beauty, Body Image, Female, Humans, Male, Personal Satisfaction, Somatotypes, Thinness, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review