Cited by 372Mental Health Treatment and AccessAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Kessler psychological distress scale: normative data from the 2007 Australian national survey of mental health and wellbeing

Slade, Tim, Grove, Rachel, Burgess, Philip·2011·Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: To present Australian normative data on the ten-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10). Method: Analysis of cross-sectional data from the 2007 Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing, a nationally representative household survey of 8841 adults. Mean K10 scores and K10 scores at selected percentiles of the K10 score distribution are presented by sex, age, the presence of mental disorders and the presence of physical conditions. Stratum-specific likelihood ratios were computed to help clinicians and researchers calculate predicted probabilities of mental disorder given scores on the K10. Results: Scores on the K10 were generally higher in women compared to men, in people with a mental disorder compared to without a mental disorder and in people with affective disorders compared to people with substance use disorders. The SSLRs were informative in ruling in a diagnosis of mental disorder, particularly at the high or very high end of the psychological distress spectrum. Conclusions: These data may be helpful for clinicians and researchers alike in understanding the likelihood of mental disorder in a given individual or sample.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/00048674.2010.543653

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Slade, T., Grove, R., & Burgess, P.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Slade, Tim
Venue
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2011-04
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
308-316
ISSN
  • 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1614
OpenAlex
W2065188129
Cited by
372
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
FWCI
26.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, K10, psychological distress, reference values, mental illness, likelihood ratios, sex differences, age differences, physical condition, mood disorders, substance use disorders, Australian adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Australia, Mental Disorders, Female, Health Status, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Reference Values, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Factors, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review