The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organizational Socialization in Higher Education
Abstract
A fact is like a sack which won't stand up when it is empty. In order that it may stand up, one has to put into it the reason and sentiment which caused it to exist. Luigi Pirandello Six Characters in Search of an Author Socialization is a concept that is much discussed but frequently misunderstood. On the one hand, the research literature is replete with taken-for-granted definitions of socialization; on the other, institutional administrators often eschew discussions of socialization as a waste of time in comparison to their attempts to solve the myriad problems currently faced by colleges and universities. In this article I advance an alternative view of socialization and highlight the importance of utilizing this view for restructuring college and university life. More specifically, I take issue with many of the common assumptions we share about organizational socialization. In so doing, I suggest that socialization is of fundamental importance with regard to many of the most pressing issues that confront academic administrators and faculty. The national conversations that begun, for example, about the nature of faculty roles in academic and public life inevitably relate to socialization and culture. In particular, I focus on socialization processes that involve tenure track faculty in four-year colleges and universities. This article is anchored in a two-year study of promotion and tenure based on interviews of over three hundred individuals - junior faculty, department chairs, tenure review committee chairs, and senior academic administrators. To be sure, the specific tenure processes vary dramatically from institution to institution; nevertheless, these processes are similar enough across institutional types to enable us to propose a schema for how we might think about organizational socialization and how we might develop policies that contribute to the successful socialization of faculty into the academy. As a beginning point, we need to consider the nature of the organizational culture in which individuals are socialized. Obviously, a culture whose values and goals are outdated or inconsistent with the world of the twenty-first century is not necessarily a culture for which we want to socialize new recruits. Accordingly, I first critique previous concepts of socialization as they relate to culture and then offer data that delineate an alternative way we might think about how faculty become socialized. I compare and contrast what I call modern and postmodern versions of culture and socialization and conclude with suggestions for improving the socialization practices of colleges and universities. Studying Socialization Background Organizational researchers, writes John Van Maanen, have over-studied relatively harsh and intensive socialization and understudied socialization of the more benign and supportive sort (1984, p. 238). Dramatic, celebratory rituals, such as Founder's Day, or graduation, or initiation rites of fraternities, afford us one window of understanding how individuals change from one social status to another or how they become incorporated or invested in an institution or discipline. In this regard the organizational literature is full of examples, from army cadets who arise at dawn and conduct drills and marches that demonstrate loyalty to the academy and their unit to various social groups, such as university marching bands and college honor societies, where the members perform hazing rituals on recruits that bond individuals to the group. Admittedly, such highly visible events surely play some role in organizational socialization, and our concentration on such examples has been helpful in rethinking actual events. Hazing, for example, is no longer officially condoned on college campuses, because whatever bonding might taken place was outweighed by the physical and emotional trauma that often occurred to recruits. However, when we concentrate on such dramatic actions, we overlook the more implicit and processual activities that circumscribe how individuals become socialized to an organization. …
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1994) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(94)92216-0 · Cited by 45,910
Social Theory and Social Structure.
Stone, G. P., & Merton, R. K. (1958) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2390803 · Cited by 4,499
Building the Learning Organization
Marquardt, M. J. (1995) · Cited by 2,767
Organizational Culture in Higher Education: Defining the Essentials
Tierney, W. G. (1988) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.2307/1981868 · Cited by 749
Self-citationHandbook of Work, Organization, and Society.
Seashore, S. E., Berg, D., & Dubin, R. (1976) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391869 · Cited by 512
McDermott, R., & Varenne, H. (1995) · Anthropology & Education Quarterly · doi:10.1525/aeq.1995.26.3.05x0936z · Cited by 482
People processing: Strategies of organizational socialization
Van Maanen, J. (1978) · Organizational Dynamics · doi:10.1016/0090-2616(78)90032-3 · Cited by 437
Building Communities of Difference: Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century
Tierney, W. G. (1995) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/358886 · Cited by 187
Self-citationThe Distinctive College: Antioch, Reed and Swarthmore
Chalmers, J., & Clark, B. R. (1970) · AAUP Bulletin · doi:10.2307/40224499 · Cited by 154
Postmodernism and Higher Education
Bioland, H. G. (1995) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.1995.11774797 · Cited by 140
Cited by
Fitting the Mold of Graduate School: A Qualitative Study of Socialization in Doctoral Education
Gardner, S. K. (2008) · Innovative Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10755-008-9068-x · Cited by 527
Gardner, S. K. (2008) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.2008.11772101 · Cited by 451
Senior management's academic experience and corporate green innovation
He, K., Chen, W., & Zhang, L. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120664 · Cited by 299
O’Meara, K., Kuvaeva, A., Nyunt, G., Waugaman, C., & Jackson, R. (2017) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831217716767 · Cited by 292
Baker, V. L., & Lattuca, L. R. (2010) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070903501887 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Tierney, W. G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-16
- ISSN
- 0022-1546 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4640
- OpenAlex
- W2044489495
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 27.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organizational Socialization in Higher Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00221546.1997.11778975
- The paper
- Tierney, W. G. (1997). Organizational Socialization in Higher Education. The Journal of Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1997.11778975
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.