Cited by 150Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessStudent Stress and Coping

Correlates of academic procrastination: discomfort, task aversiveness, and task capability.

Milgram, Noach, Marshevsky, Sergio, Sadeh, Chaya·1995·The Journal of Psychology

Abstract

The relationships among five aspects of academic procrastination--behavioral delay, personal upset about the delay, task aversiveness, task capability, and the desire to reduce behavioral delay--were investigated in 10th-grade Israeli students (N = 195). Upset about delay was weakly related to delay itself, and--unlike delay--was strongly related to perceived capability to perform academic tasks and to the desire to change delaying behavior. Students delayed more on academic tasks labeled unpleasant than pleasant, were neutral in between, and were correspondingly more upset about the former than the latter. They more frequently acknowledged reasons for academic procrastination that were less threatening to their self-image (e.g., problems in time management) than reasons that were more threatening (e.g., lack of ability). Interest in reducing delay is related more to self-perceived ability to handle tasks than to time spent procrastinating or reasons given for procrastinating.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00223980.1995.9914954

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aversive tasks are characterized by lower autonomy, lower task significance, boredom, resentment, frustration, and difficulty.

    “Closer examination of the task aversiveness literature demonstrates that aversive tasks are characterized by lower autonomy, lower task significance, boredom, resentment, frustration, and difficulty (Milgram et al., 1988; Milgram et al., 1995; Blunt and Pychyl, 2000; Steel, 2007).”

    From How Study Environments Foster Academic Procrastination: Overview and Recommendations (2020) · cites this paper as Milgram et al., 1995

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 13 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bandura A., 1986, The social foundations of thought and action: A social-cognitive theory
  2. Deaux K., 1976, The behavior of men and women
  3. Hermon L., 1991, The relationship of pupils' perceptions of their parents' attitudes toward them and the kind of academic task undertaken to procrastination in achieving and under-achieving pupils
  4. Hill M. B., 1978, College Student Journal, 12, 256

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Milgram, N., Marshevsky, S., & Sadeh, C.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Venue
The Journal of Psychology
Published
1995-03
Volume
129
Issue
2
Pages
145-155
ISSN
  • 0022-3980 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-1019
OpenAlex
W2072328601
Cited by
149
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
academic procrastination, task aversiveness, self-perceived ability, discomfort, time management, high school students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Aptitude, Avoidance Learning, Cognitive Dissonance, Defense Mechanisms, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Motivation, Self Concept, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review