CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 177Marriage and Sexual RelationshipsGender Roles and Identity StudiesGender and Feminist Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“Anything From Making Out to Having Sex”: Men's Negotiations of Hooking Up and Friends With Benefits Scripts

Epstein, Marina, Calzo, Jerel P., Smiler, Andrew P., Ward, L. Monique·2009·Journal of Sex Research
DOI 10.1080/00224490902775801
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Popular media and academic literature often portray men as happy beneficiaries of nonrelational or casual sex--a view that is consistent with traditional notions of masculinity. This study examined the validity of this notion, using semistructured interviews to explore ways that 19 college-age men defined and enacted "hooking up" and "friends with benefits" scripts. Men's definitions reflected both standard and alternate conceptions of these scripts, and their experiences indicated variability in intentions and outcomes. Whereas a few men embraced the no-strings-attached nonrelational scripts, most rejected the script or enacted an amended version that allowed for greater relational connection. Further, their experiences were not all positive and were not all devoid of emotional connection. These alternative enactments challenge the pro-masculine, universally positive conceptualization of nonrelational sex portrayed in the media and in some empirical research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00224490902775801

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Baxter S., 2004, The Sunday Times, 29
  2. Denizet-Lewis B., 2004, New York Times Magazine, 30
  3. Iggers J., 2004, Star Tribune, 5B
  4. Maticka-Tyndale E., 1997, Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 6, 317
  5. Rackl L., 2005, Chicago Sun-Times, 24

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Epstein, M., Calzo, J. P., Smiler, A. P., & Ward, L. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Epstein, Marina
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Sex Research
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2009-09-24
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
414-424
ISSN
  • 0022-4499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-8519
DOI
10.1080/00224490902775801
OpenAlex
W1985489051
Cited by
177
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 13
FWCI
32.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Sex Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (T32-HD007109-26, T32HD007109)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
hooking up, friends with benefits, casual sex, masculinity, male sexual behavior, sexual scripts, emotional connection
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Courtship, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Sexual Partners, Midwestern United States, Negotiating, Homosexuality, Male, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review