Cited by 21Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesCrime Patterns and Interventions

A framework for understanding sexual violence: Incentive-motivation and hierarchical control

Open access
Toates, Frederick, Smid, Wineke, van den Berg, Jan Willem·2017·Aggression and Violent Behavior

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.avb.2017.01.001

Cites

193 of 193 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Following the idea that sexual violence in avoidant individuals may be a way to control the partner, this result makes sense as gender differences in sexuality are often attributed to a different valence in terms of dominance motivation.

    “Following the idea that sexual violence in avoidant individuals may be a way to control the partner, this result makes sense as gender differences in sexuality are often attributed to a different valence in terms of dominance motivation (Malamuth, 1998; Toates et al., 2017).”

    From Exploring Relationships: A Systematic Review on Intimate Partner Violence and Attachment (2018) · cites this paper as Toates et al., 2017

    Sections 5.1 and 8.1 link dominance motivation with sexual violence and describe sex–power associations in some men. They do not establish a gender difference in the valence of dominance motivation; the passages found on attachment also do not identify avoidant individuals or say that they use sexual violence to control a partner. No page numbers were supplied in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 199 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Berkowitz, L. (1993). Towards a general theory of anger and emotional aggression: Impli- cations of the cognitive-neoassociationistic perspective for the analysis of anger and other emotions. In R. S. Wyer, & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Perspectives on anger and emotion: Advances in social cognition. Vol. VI. (pp. 1-46). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
  2. Bindra, D. (1978). How adaptive-behavior is produced -perceptual-motivational alterna- tive to response-reinforcement. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 41-52.
  3. Chan, H., & Heide, K. M. (2009). Sexual Homicide. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 10(1), 31-54.
  4. De Ridder, D. T. D., de Witt Huberts, J. C., & Evers, C. (2015). License to sin: Reasoning pro- cesses in desire. In W. Hoffman, & L. F. Nordgren (Eds.), The Psychology of Desire (pp. 199-224). New York: The Guilford Press.
  5. Denson, T. F., Schofield, T. P., & Fabiansson, E. C. (2015). Aggressive desires. In W. Hoffman, & L. F. Nordgren (Eds.), The psychology of desire (pp. 369-389). New York: The Guilford Press.
  6. Dutton, D., & Strachan, C. (1987). Motivational needs for power and dominance as differ- entiating variables of assaultive and non-assaultive men. Violence and Victims, 2(3), 145-156.
  7. Fiske, A. P., & Rai, T. S. (2014). Virtuous violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Fodor, E. M. (2010). Power motivation. In O. C. Schultheiss, & J. C. Brunstein (Eds.), Implicit motives (pp. 3-29). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  9. Gannon, T. A., Ward, T., Beech, A. R., & Fisher, D. (2007). Introduction. In T. A. Gannon, T. Ward, A. R. Beech, & D. Fisher (Eds.), Aggressive offenders' cognition: Theory, research and practice (pp. 1-7). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  10. Grant, J. E., Potenza, M. N., Weinstein, A., & Gorelick, D. A. (2010). Introduction to be- havioral addictions. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 36(5), 233-241.
  11. Hall, J. L., Stanton, S. J., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2010). Biopsychological and neural processes of implicit motivation. In O. Schultheiss, & J. C. Brunstein (Eds.), Implicit motives (pp. 279-307). Oxford University Press: Oxford.
  12. Hoffman, & L. F. Nordgren (Eds.), The psychology of desire (pp. 129-145). New York: The Guilford Press.
  13. Lopez, R. B., Wagner, D. D., & Heatherton, T. F. (2015). Neuroscience of desire regulation. In W. Hoffman, & L. F. Nordgren (Eds.), The psychology of desire (pp. 146-160). New York: The Guilford Press.
  14. MacLean, P. D. (1990). The triune brain in evolution. New York: Plenum Press.
  15. McClelland, D., & Wilsnack, S. C. (1972). The effects of drinking on thoughts about power and restraint. In D. C. McClelland, W. N. Davis, R. Kalin, & E. Wanner (Eds.), The drink- ing man (pp. 123-141). New York: The Free Press.
  16. Porter, S., Demetroff, S., & ten Brinke, L. (2010). The sexual psychopath -Current understanding and future challenges. In A. Schlank (Ed.), The sexual predator: Legal issues. Assessment. Treatment, IV. Kingston, N.J.: Civic Research Institute (pp.13-11 and 13-16).
  17. Rousseau, J. -J. (1781/1953). The confessions. London: Penguin Books.
  18. Schultheiss, O., & Brunstein, J. (2010). Implicit motives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  19. Spiering, M., & Everaerd, W. (2007). The sexual unconscious. In E. Janssen (Ed.), The psy- chophysiology of sex (pp. 166-184). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  20. Stanton, S. J., Hall, J. L., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2010). Properties of motive-specific incentives. In O. C. Schultheiss, & J. C. Brunstein (Eds.), Implicit motives (pp. 245-278). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  21. Thornhill, R., & Palmer, C. T. (2000). A natural history of rape. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  22. Toates, F. (1986). Motivational systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  23. Ward, T., & Brown, M. (2003). The risk-need model of offender rehabilitation. In T. Ward, D. R. Laws, & S. M. Hudson (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Issues and controversies (pp. 338-353). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Toates, F., Smid, W., & van den Berg, J. W.
Affiliations
  • The Open University (GB)
  • De Forensische Zorgspecialisten (NL)
Corresponding author
Toates, Frederick
Venue
Aggression and Violent Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
34
Pages
238-253
ISSN
1359-1789 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2570410704
Cited by
21
References
199
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Aggression and Violent Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
sexual violence, rape, sexual motivation, sensation seeking, dopamine, excitation-inhibition balance, impulsivity, future discounting, habituation, escalation, sexual fantasies, fetish, stress, drugs, brain development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review