Cited by 2Sexual function and dysfunction studiesReproductive Health and ContraceptionGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

A thematic analysis of couples’ sexual well-being following a recent pregnancy loss

Open access
Schwenck, Gracielle C., Allsop, David B., Cohen, Eva, Rosen, Natalie O.·2025·The Journal of Sex Research

Abstract

Pregnancy loss has been linked to poorer mental and relationship well-being. Given that strong sexual well-being is associated with better mental and physical health, understanding sexual well-being following a recent pregnancy loss may contribute to education and treatment models. Yet, little research has examined the effects of pregnancy loss on both couple members’ sexual well-being. Accordingly, using Marks’ team-based method for inductive thematic analysis, this qualitative study examined three open-ended questions regarding how individuals’ (N = 255 individuals, across 133 couples) sexual well-being reportedly changed – positively and negatively – and was supported following a recent pregnancy loss (i.e. within 5 months). We also considered if the identified themes differed in frequency between women and gender-diverse individuals who were pregnant when the loss occurred, and men, women, and gender-diverse partners who were not pregnant. Across participants, we found three themes regarding positive changes (e.g. Relationship growth; A new meaning to sex), five themes related to negative changes (e.g. Decreased desire and frequency; Health and body changes), four themes pertaining to support factors (e.g. Communicating openly; Offering support and respecting readiness), and three themes reflecting: No positive changes, No negative changes, and Nothing done to support sexual well-being. Results of this study may guide psychoeducation to increase awareness of potential changes following pregnancy loss and encourage supportive behaviors to benefit couple members’ sexual well-being.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00224499.2024.2441835

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Parents who suffer perinatal loss face relationship difficulties, with most couples suffering a decline in intimacy.

    “as well as relationship difficulties, with most couples suffering from a decline in intimacy (Allsop et al., 2025; Schwenck et al., 2025).”

    From Nurses' and midwives' experiences of supporting parents following perinatal bereavement: A qualitative systematic review (2026) · cites this paper as Schwenck et al., 2025

    The paper describes relationship and sexual difficulties after pregnancy loss, but it does not establish that most couples experience a decline in intimacy. In “Pregnancy loss and sexual well-being,” it reports that 65% of women in an earlier study had lower sexual intimacy one week after miscarriage; at later follow-ups, most reported a sexual relationship that was the same or closer than before the loss. That short-term finding about women does not support the claim about most couples. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gaia, A. C. (2002). Understanding emotional intimacy: A review of conceptualization, assessment and the role of gender. International Social Science Review, 77(3/4), 151-170. https://doi.org/10.2307/41887101 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schwenck, G. C., Allsop, D. B., Cohen, E., & Rosen, N. O.
Affiliations
Dalhousie University (CA)
Corresponding author
Rosen, Natalie O.
Venue
The Journal of Sex Research
Published
2024-12-20
Volume
62
Issue
8
Pages
1498-1513
ISSN
  • 0022-4499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-8519
OpenAlex
W4405643190
Cited by
2
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Sex Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DalSpace (Dalhousie University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • IWK Health Centre (1026674)
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (435-2017-0534)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
miscarriage, sexual well-being, couples, sexual desire, sexual frequency, gender-diverse people, relationship growth, sexual support, psychoeducation
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Adult, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Partners, Qualitative Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review