Cited by 75Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research TopicsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Depression and intolerance of uncertainty: Relations between uncertainty subfactors and depression dimensions

Saulnier, Kevin G., Allan, Nicholas P., Raines, Amanda M., Schmidt, Norman B.·2019·Psychiatry

Abstract

Depression is often modeled as a unidimensional construct despite evidence for distinct symptom dimensions (i.e., cognitive, affective, and somatic symptoms). Intolerance of uncertainty (IU; a cognitive bias that increases distress in uncertain situations) is a risk factor implicated in the development of depression. However, it is unclear how IU lower-order dimensions (i.e., inhibitory IU, the fear of future unpredictable events; prospective IU, avoidance due to fear of uncertain events) relate to depressive symptoms. The current study used confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling to examine the relations between depressive symptoms and lower-order dimensions of IU in a sample of 374 adults (M age = 35.5, 54.3% female) with elevated psychopathology (89.2% meeting criteria for at least one DSM-5 diagnosis, 25.6% primary depressive disorder). A two-factor model of depression, composed of Cognitive and Affective/Somatic factors, provided superior model fit compared to one- and three-factor solutions. A bifactor model of IU, composed of a general IU factor and specific Inhibitory IU and Prospective IU factors, provided superior model fit compared to one- and two-factor solutions. The general IU factor related to both Cognitive and Affective/Somatic factors. Inhibitory IU related to the Cognitive factor, but not the Affective/Somatic factor. Prospective IU was not related to Cognitive or Affective/Somatic factors. These findings elucidate the relations between IU and depression symptoms and have important theoretical implications regarding the etiology of depressive symptoms. In particular, inhibitory IU may be a novel target for intervention efforts in individuals presenting with depressive symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00332747.2018.1560583

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saulnier, K. G., Allan, N. P., Raines, A. M., & Schmidt, N. B.
Affiliations
  • Ohio University (US)
  • Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Centers (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Saulnier, Kevin G.
Venue
Psychiatry
Published
2019-01-02
Volume
82
Issue
1
Pages
72-79
ISSN
  • 0033-2747 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-281X
OpenAlex
W2914391675
Cited by
75
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6
FWCI
9.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs (W81XWH-10-2-0181/FSU 030969)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
depression, intolerance of uncertainty, inhibitory intolerance of uncertainty, bifactor model, cognitive symptoms, cognitive biases, etiology of depression
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Theoretical, Risk Factors, Uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review