Cited by 694Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and Assessment

Factor structure, concurrent validity, and internal consistency of the beck depression inventory?second edition in a sample of college students

Open access
Storch, Eric A., Roberti, Jonathan W., Roth, Deborah A.·2004·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

We examined the psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II) [Beck et al., 1996, San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation]. Four hundred fourteen undergraduate students at two public universities participated. A confirmatory factor analysis supported the BDI-II two-factor structure measuring cognitive-affective and somatic depressive symptoms. In addition, the internal consistency was high and the concurrent validity of the BDI-II was supported by positive correlations with self-report measures of depression and anxiety. These findings replicate prior research supporting the validity and reliability of the BDI-II in a college sample.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.20002

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) are used clinically and possess strong psychometric validity and reliability.

    “Both tests are used clinically and possess strong psychometric validity and reliability [64–66].”

    From A 'choice', an 'addiction', a way 'out of the lost': Exploring self-injury in autistic people without intellectual disability (2019) · cites this paper as [66]

    The Introduction describes the BDI-II as widely used in clinical populations, and the Results and Discussion report good internal consistency and evidence of validity in college students (article pp. 187–189). The paper does not assess the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI); its anxiety measure is the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Thus it supports the claim about the BDI-II, but not about both tests. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. 1996. Beck Depression Inventory- Second Edition manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
  2. Spielberger CD. 1989. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: A comprehen- sive bibliography. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  3. Whisman MA, Perez JE, Ramel W. 2000. Factor structure of the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II) in a student sample. J Clin Psychol 56:545-551.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Storch, E. A., Roberti, J. W., & Roth, D. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • New College of Florida (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Storch, Eric A.
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Published
2004
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
187-189
ISSN
  • 1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6394
OpenAlex
W2094249471
Cited by
694
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 35
FWCI
19.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
Beck Depression Inventory-II, depression assessment, psychometric properties, factor structure, somatic depressive symptoms, internal consistency, concurrent validity, university students, anxiety
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Cognition, Depression, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Personality Inventory, Self-Assessment, Students, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review