Cited by 337Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies

Brief Report: Intolerance of Uncertainty, Worry, and Depression

Dugas, Michel J., Schwartz, Andrea, Francis, Kylie·2004·Cognitive Therapy and Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10608-004-0669-0

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dugas, M. J., Schwartz, A., & Francis, K.
Affiliations
  • Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (CA)
  • Concordia University (CA)
Corresponding author
Dugas, Michel J.
Venue
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Published
2004-12
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
835-842
ISSN
  • 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2819
OpenAlex
W2001830326
Cited by
337
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive Therapy and Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
Keywords
intolerance of uncertainty, worry, depression, dysfunctional attitudes, non-clinical sample, undergraduate students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review