The DOI matches its Crossref record; 123 of the 125 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 2 are not checked yet.
Supporting Learners' Agentic Engagement With Feedback: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processes
Open accessAbstract
Much has been written in the educational psychology literature about effective feedback and how to deliver it. However, it is equally important to understand how learners actively receive, engage with, and implement feedback. This article reports a systematic review of the research evidence pertaining to this issue. Through an analysis of 195 outputs published between 1985 and early 2014, we identified various factors that have been proposed to influence the likelihood of feedback being used. Furthermore, we identified diverse interventions with the common aim of supporting and promoting learners' agentic engagement with feedback processes. We outline the various components used in these interventions, and the reports of their successes and limitations. Moreover we propose a novel taxonomy of four recipience processes targeted by these interventions. This review and taxonomy provide a theoretical basis for conceptualizing learners' responsibility within feedback dialogues and for guiding the strategic design and evaluation of interventions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This supports contemporary feedback scholarship, which views feedback as an active process of learner sense-making and action rather than the passive transmission of information [2, 4, 20, 27, 67].”
From Making AI-Generated Feedback Matter: A Large-Scale Study of Feedback Workflows and Student Enactment (2026) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“The feedback component, in particular, requires careful consideration in its design and delivery, as its effectiveness depends not only on the content and timing but also on students' receptivity and ability to implement suggested improvements [8][9][10].”
From Formative assessment and feedback in medical education: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 189 (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“In contrast, the phase of receiving feedback appears to be more complex (e.g., Lipnevich & Smith, 2022;Winstone et al., 2017)”
From Enhancing the Peer-Feedback Process Through Instructional Support: A Meta-Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Winstone et al., 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905
Assessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152 · cited 1×
“Receiving feedback on one’s skills and understanding is an invaluable part of the learning process, benefiting learners far more than does simply receiving praise or punishment (Black & Wiliam, 1998; Hattie & Timperley, 2007).”
BackgroundKluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 · Cited by 5,882
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070600572090 · Cited by 5,846
Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis
Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543065003245 · Cited by 3,334
Issues in Educational Research
Keeves, J. P., & Lakomski, G. (1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,531
Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (1975) · Cited by 2,315
Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design
Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.691462 · Cited by 1,636 · cited 5×
“Indeed, although the term “feedback” is commonly used in a way that connotes passivity (Ball, 2010; Boud & Molloy, 2013a, 2013b; Parboteeah & Anwar, 2009), researchers increasingly acknowledge that “if information is simply stored in memory and never used, it is not feedback” (Orsmond, Merry, &…”
BackgroundInfluentialAgency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities
Reeve, J., & Tseng, C.-M. (2011) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002 · Cited by 1,618
Conditions Under Which Assessment Supports Students’ Learning
Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2005) · Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire) · Cited by 1,265
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Dahllöf G., 2004, European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 5, 163
- Gibbs G., 2004, Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3
- 10.1080/21567069.2011.586677 · DOI
- Hounsell D., 2007, Rethinking assessment in higher education. Learning for the longer term, 101
- MacDonald R. B., 1991, Review of Research in Developmental Education, 8, 3
- Millar J., 2010, Brookes e-Journal of Learning and Teaching, 2
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 885
Chen, Y., Yu, S., LIANG, C., & Zhou, N. (2026) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/s10936-025-10191-z · Cited by 1
“Despite multiple benefits, the impacts of teacher feedback on students’ writing development depend largely on student engagement, which has been regarded as a critical linking mechanism between teacher feedback and students’ learning progress (Winstone et al., 2017; Vattøy, Gamlem, & Rogne, 2021).”
Zavala, P. A. H., Luo, C., Matos-Cámara, R. F., & Vilaboa, R. B. (2026) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2025.2612315 · Cited by 1
Empowering Engagement with Learning Analytics-Based Feedback for Programming Education
Chan, C. M.-P., Wong, U. H., Lam, C. K., Pang, P. C., & Mendes, A. J. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering · doi:10.1109/tale66047.2025.11346593 · Cited by 1
“Studies have attempted to investigate various initiatives for student engagement enhancement with feedback [38].”
Academic ability generates better quality feedback: Evidence from PeerWise assessments
Huang, W., Stephens, J. M., & Brown, G. (2026) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101566 · Cited by 1
van Kessel, M., Campen, C. K. K.-V., de Jonge, M., Molenaar, I., & Saab, N. (2026) · Comput. Educ. · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105615 · Cited by 2
The LMS as actor: how learning management systems shape and constrain feedback practices
Buchanan, J. (2026) · Learning Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2026.2644378 · Cited by 1
Wei, D. (2026) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688261427110 · Cited by 1
Toward an Understanding of Self-Efficacy Development as a Sociocultural Process
Usher, E. L., & Chen, X. (2026) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-026-10121-y · Cited by 5
İstencioğlu, T., Yang, L., Dawson, P., & Boud, D. J. (2026) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2026.2661361 · Cited by 3
Fan, C., Huang, J., Kumar, J., Liu, Y., Zhu, Q., Tang, X., & Fan, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1821661 · Cited by 1
“A recurring finding in higher education is that feedback often fails to generate meaningful change because students do not understand it, do not trust it, do not know how to use it, or do not act on it (Boud and Molloy, 2013a; Carless, 2015; Winstone et al., 2017).”
Liu, Y., Yu, H., He, S., & Yang, L. (2026) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2026.2685746 · Cited by 1
The Negative Effects of Self‐Focused Feedback on Mathematics Problem Solving
Fyfe, E. R., Grenell, A., & Vest, N. A. (2026) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.70239 · Cited by 1
Effects of guiding feedback on students’ performance, calibration, and self-efficacy
Razeghpour, F., & Rolka, K. (2026) · LUMAT International Journal on Math Science and Technology Education · doi:10.31129/lumat.14.4.2692 · Cited by 1
“Feedback processing is a critical factor in learning (Jonsson, 2013; Winstone et al., 2017).”
Yang, Z., Zhang, L. J., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2026.2695231 · Cited by 1
Gao, X., Schunn, C. D., Noroozi, O., Gulikers, J. T. M., Biemans, H. J. A., & Banihashem, S. K. (2026) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2026.102428 · Cited by 1
Lin, X. Y., Hu, R., & Xu, L. (2026) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2026.2689534 · Cited by 1
Jansen, T., Bahr, J. L., Schaller, N.-J., Höft, L., & Meyer, J. (2026) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2026.102969 · Cited by 2
Fei, X. (2026) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.70080 · Cited by 1
Metricized Scaffolds: AI-Enabled Simulation Training and Transfer in Human Resource Development
Xie, N., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2026) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci16080372 · Cited by 1
Pünjer, H., Schiller, R., Höft, L., Meyer, J., & Jansen, T. (2026) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2026.102980 · Cited by 1
Wang, S., & Yu, S. (2026) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2026.2721320 · Cited by 1
“…the broad scope of the topic, review articles or syntheses of existing feedback models or theories were also consulted to ensure seminal works were not overlooked (e.g. Lui and Andrade 2022; Molloy and Boud 2014; Panadero and Lipnevich 2022; Shute 2008; Thurlings et al. 2013; Winstone et al. 2017).”
Conceptualising student assessment literacy: an integrative framework of its elements and dimensions
Guo, H., & Miao, H. (2026) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2026.2730117 · Cited by 1
“These skills also involve designing and refining assessment tasks and managing assessment-related information effectively, particularly in collaborative learning contexts (Dann, 2012; Kostons et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2024; Winstone et al., 2017).”
Chen, S. C., Borchers, C., & Schunn, C. D. (2026) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2026.102489 · Cited by 1
Moffat, D. C., & Аркадьевна, Ш. О. (2019) · Computer Science Education Research Conference · doi:10.1145/3375258.3375262 · Cited by 1
Assessment strategies and employability in the environmental and engineering sectors
Bartlett, D., & Sims, D. (2021) · Compass Journal of Learning and Teaching · doi:10.21100/compass.v14i2.1182 · Cited by 1
“Haak (2019) reminded academics that focusing on summative assessment ignores decades of research on the ways that assessment can facilitate and enable students’ learning, a perception corroborated by the systematic review of learner engagement with feedback carried out by Winstone et al. (2017).”
BackgroundAcademic success and individual differences
Cachia, M., Butcher, R., Stock, R., & Lynam, S. (2021) · New Vistas · doi:10.36828/newvistas.24 · Cited by 1
Quigley, D., Gilheaney, Ó., O’Neill, M., & Davis, S. (2021) · Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica · doi:10.1159/000519614 · Cited by 2
Larsen, E. H., & Kaspersen, K. (2022) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781800881150.00019 · Cited by 1
Razali, R. (2023) · International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development · doi:10.6007/ijarped/v12-i1/15729 · Cited by 1
Práce učitele s žákovskou chybou v komunikaci s celou třídou
Majcík, M. (2022) · Masarykova univerzita eBooks · doi:10.5817/cz.muni.m280-0127-2022 · Cited by 1
Peer and Collaborative Assessment
Gunning, T. K., Adachi, C., & Tai, J. (2023) · University development and administration · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-9438-8_18-1 · Cited by 1
Unobtrusively Measuring Learning Processes: Where Are We Now?
Dawson, S. (2023) · Advances in analytics for learning and teaching · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-30992-2_7 · Cited by 1
Mediating Open & Distance e-Learning in the Advent of Global Crises
Letseka, M., Roberts, J. J., & Akintolu, M. (2023) · Unisa Press eBooks · doi:10.25159/146 · Cited by 3
Muñoz, D. R., & Araya, D. H. (2023) · Revista Brasileira de Educação · doi:10.1590/s1413-24782023280123 · Cited by 16
Retroalimentación en el desarrollo del pensamiento social en educación secundaria
Araya, D. H., & Jofré, M. I. T. (2023) · Estudios pedagógicos · doi:10.4067/s0718-07052023000200417 · Cited by 1
Mitchum, C., Rodrigo, R., & Koenig, S. (2024) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.58680/ccc2024753513 · Cited by 1
AbuSa’aleek, A. O., & Yaghi, E. T. (2024) · Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal · doi:10.37237/150107 · Cited by 1
Lipnevich, A. A., Janelli, M., Park, M. J., Calistro, T., & Eßer, F. J. (2024) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2024.2398513 · Cited by 1
“Although research on feedback supports positive links with academic achievement in a traditional classroom, there is an opportunity for further examination of feedback types, feedback delivery, and feedback uptake in MOOCs (e.g., Hattie, 2012; Smith & Lipnevich, 2018; Winstone et al., 2017).”
Police Recruits’ Perceptions of the Utility of Body-Worn Cameras as a Training Tool
Deck, S. L., Porter, L. E., Powell, M. B., & Alpert, G. P. (2024) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/00938548241302478 · Cited by 2
“In recent years, conceptualizations of feedback have shifted from being understood as a source of information received by a passive recipient to a process wherein learners have an active role (Carless & Boud, 2018; winstone et al., 2017).”
Parmigiani, D., Nicchia, E., Pario, M., Murgia, E., Radović, S., & Ingersoll, M. (2025) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.70056 · Cited by 7
Formative Assessment in Physics Teaching and Learning
Papadouris, N., & Constantinou, C. P. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96184-2_6 · Cited by 1
Facilitating Students’ Proactive Recipience of Feedback with Feedback Portfolios
Balloo, K., & Vashakidze, A. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-35396-4_16 · Cited by 1
English as a Foreign Language Teachers' Perception of Effective Feedback.
Seden, K., & Švaříček, R. (2018) · Journal of the International Society for Teacher Education · Cited by 1
Validation of the Korean version of Feedback Environment Scale for Students(K-FESS)
Kim, J.-U., & Sohn, W. (2020) · Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation · doi:10.29221/jce.2020.23.2.203 · Cited by 1
Developing Engagement with Data
Maxwell, G. S. (2021) · The enabling power of assessment · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-63539-8_10 · Cited by 1
Exploring predictors affecting students' and teachers' feedback experience using random forests
Park, M., & Lee, B. (2021) · Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation · doi:10.29221/jce.2021.24.2.103 · Cited by 1
Reimann, N., Sambell, K., Sadler, I., & Kreber, C. (2021) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781789907476.00025 · Cited by 1
“Feedback is like a tail wind”: pre-service teachers’ and teacher educators’ perceptions of feedback
Hunt, P., & Karm, M. (2022) · Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri = Estonian Journal of Education · doi:10.12697/eha.2022.10.1.07 · Cited by 1
Instruction and Student Engagement: Implications for Academic Engaged Time
Burns, M. K., Stevens, M. A., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-07853-8_22 · Cited by 2
Saíz, R. M. M., Espasa, A., Guasch, T., & Melo, M. M. (2023) · RIED Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia · doi:10.5944/ried.26.2.36242 · Cited by 2
“Según Winstone et al. (2017), la relación entre el feedback y la autoeficacia es bidireccional, de modo que el feedback no solo sirve para informar de la autoeficacia e incidir en la misma, sino que también este se interpreta de forma distinta dependiendo del nivel de autoeficacia por parte de los…”
BackgroundInfluentialJärvelä, S., Malmberg, J., & Järvelä, H. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-6887-7_115 · Cited by 1
Formative assessment of language learning strategies
Gu, Y. (2020) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.12744719 · Cited by 1
Molloy, E., Noble, C., & Hu, W. C. Y. (2022) · Focus on Health Professional Education A Multi-Professional Journal · doi:10.11157/fohpe.v23i3.686 · Cited by 1
Liu, X., Wang, J., & Zou, B. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4945135 · Cited by 1
Pfister, D., Ritter, Y., Steckhan, G. M., Voelter‐Mahlknecht, S., Weber, B., Ellegast, R. P., Grüber, M., & Schwenk, M. (2024) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.12.19.24319321 · Cited by 1
Making AI-Generated Feedback Matter: A Large-Scale Study of Feedback Workflows and Student Enactment
Alsaiari, O., Baghaei, N., Lodge, J. M., Gaševi'c, D., Winstone, N., & Khosravi, H. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.11625
“EMMs on the expected rating scale indicated the same descriptive ordering: Enacted Feedback , 4.20 (95% CI [4.18, 4.21]); Directed Feedback , 4.13 (95% CI [4.11, 4.15]); and Self-Directed Feedback , 4.03 (95% CI [4.00, 4.05]).”
InfluentialSelf-citationThe Impact of Middle-School Students' Feedback Choices and Performance on Their Feedback Memory.
Cutumisu, M., & Schwartz, D. L. (2016) · International Association for Development of the Information Society
Murthy, V., Choudhury, S., & Shakila, R. (2018) · SBV Journal of Basic Clinical and Applied Health Science · doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10082-01136
From Local to Institutional Attainment Change: scaling-up local initiatives
Gravestock, P., & Cureton, D. (2019) · Compass Journal of Learning and Teaching · doi:10.21100/compass.v12i1.941
“This process aligns with the proposal that assessment activities will be more effective at promoting and supporting learning if students have been involved in the process as active participants and partners (Nicol, 2009; Winstone et al., 2017).”
BackgroundLecturer Formative Feedback Preferences: The Influence of Disciplines
Chang-Tik, C. (2019) · International Education Studies · doi:10.5539/ies.v12n12p1
From text to audiovisual feedback: enhancing clarity, usefulness and satisfaction
Ryan, T., Phillips, M., & Henderson, M. (2019) · ASCILITE Publications · doi:10.14742/apubs.2019.273
“Moreover, literature reveals that when students experience adverse emotional reactions to feedback comments, their receptiveness, sense making, and motivation can be negatively impacted (Molloy, Borrell-Carrio, & Epstein 2013; Pitt & Norton 2016; Winstone et al. 2017).”
BackgroundFathi, L. (2019) · Summit (Simon Fraser University)
Bartlett, D. (2021) · Compass Journal of Learning and Teaching · doi:10.21100/compass.v14i1.1121
Davis, K. (2020) · Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) · doi:10.17869/enu.2020.2694574
External knowledge absorption in Chinese SMEs
Pi, L. (2021) · Leiden Repository (Leiden University)
Contemporary Teacher Education: A Global Perspective
Tirri, K. A. (2021) · MDPI eBooks · doi:10.3390/books978-3-0365-1689-9 · Cited by 1
Relationen mellan lärares intentioner och deras respons till elever
Balan, A., & Jönsson, A. (2021) · Educare - vetenskapliga skrifter · doi:10.24834/educare.2021.4.4
An Open Letter to Student Authors: Addressing the Challenges
Hirst, S. P., Stares, R., & Navenec, C.-L. L. (2021) · International Journal of Nursing Student Scholarship
Lecturer’s Feedback and Students’ Writing Performance: Social Constructivism Perspective
Safitri, H. D. A., & Hamamah, H. (2021) · ASATIZA Jurnal Pendidikan · doi:10.46963/asatiza.v2i3.389
“Winstone et al. (2016) stated that exercises involving drafting, feedback, and improvement are often recommended.”
BackgroundPark, M., & Sohn, W. (2021) · Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation · doi:10.29221/jce.2021.24.4.269
Editors, R. (2019) · International Journal of Sociology of Education · doi:10.17583/rise.2019.4755
Corrective Feedback in the EFL Classroom: Grammar Checker vs. Teacher’s Feedback.
Puertas, T. H. (2022) · Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) · doi:10.6035/14110.2022.149225
Hunter, W. J. (2022) · Journal of Educational Informatics · doi:10.51357/jei.v3i1.178
Feedback on failurePreprint
Gök, S., & Fyfe, E. R. (2022) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/97qcb
Dockerill, B., Mell, I. C., & Nurse, A. (2021) · Transactions of the Association of European Schools of Planning · doi:10.24306/traesop.2021.02.003
Produktivní práce učitele s žákovskou chybou při komunikaci s celou třídou
Majcík, M. (2022) · Studia Paedagogica · doi:10.5817/sp2022-1-3 · Cited by 1
Virtual Reality for Teacher Training
Cárdenas, M. M., Valdivia, I. M. Á., Manero, B., & Romero-Hernández, A. (2022) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-3398-0.ch002
Wilder, K. (2019) · American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting (AERA) · doi:10.3102/1435384
Alemdağ, E. (2022) · Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment · doi:10.1177/07342829221125020
“recipience of feedback or active engagement with peer feedback to self-assess and improve their learning and performance (Winstone et al., 2017).”
BackgroundTicks and crosses in primary mathematics assessments: What purpose do they serve?
Chihodzi, B., Mwakapenda, W., & Ngulube, B. (2022) · Pythagoras · doi:10.4102/pythagoras.v43i1.647
Factors Impacting OT and OTA Student Feedback Use during Level II Fieldwork Experiences
Hatkevich, B. A., Pottkotter, E. R., & Stotz, N. L. (2022) · Journal of Occupational Therapy Education · doi:10.26681/jote.2022.060409
“To effectively use feedback, students must be engaged, recognize it as useful, and understand the meaning behind the feedback provided (Winstone et al., 2017).”
Estratégias para promover a agência do estudante no processo de avaliação e feedback digital
Casanova, D. (2022) · Revista Portuguesa de Educação · doi:10.21814/rpe.23750 · Cited by 2
Higher Education Psychology Teacher of the Year: Finalist Case Study 2021
Penn, P. (2022) · Psychology Teaching Review · doi:10.53841/bpsptr.2022.28.1.66
Teacher Feedback Practice: Perceptions of Middle and High School Students in Mainland China
Miao, J. (2023) · SHS Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/shsconf/202315704001
“Past researchers assumed that if productive feedback was delivered, then learning will automatically follow [11] .”
BackgroundNasri, N., Rahimi, N. M., Hashim, H. B., & Nasri, N. M. (2023) · International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research · doi:10.26803/ijlter.22.2.13
Das Schreibentwicklungsportfolio – Durch formatives Feedback zu akademischen Schreibfertigkeiten
Wischgoll, A., & Mezger, R. (2021) · BzL - Beiträge zur Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung · doi:10.36950/bzl.39.2021.9227
Using Vicarious Learning Feedback Videos as Self-directed Learning Resources in a LMOOC Context
Zhang, H., & Wei, W. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-33023-0_38
Ranieri, M., Ancillotti, I., & Roffi, A. (2023) · EDUCATION SCIENCES AND SOCIETY · doi:10.3280/ess1-2023oa15191 · Cited by 1
Forschungssynthesen in der Mediendidaktik Ansätze und Herausforderungen
Bedenlier, S., Buntins, K., Wilmers, A., & Kerres, M. (2023) · MedienPädagogik Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung · doi:10.21240/mpaed/54.x
The Importance of Student Partnership in Rubric Construction, Discussion, and Evaluation
Laville, A., Thompson, L., Yue, Y., Hayward, A. J., & Grace-Bland, V. (2023) · Advances in educational marketing, administration, and leadership book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-6086-3.ch007
Toward a Programmatic Approach for Remediation: Evidence-Based Goals for Institutions
Tran, B. P., & Chou, C. L. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-32404-8_2
Eijkelboom, C. (2023) · doi:10.33540/1853
Feedback practices at school in home confinement at primary level during the Covid 19-pandemic
Svanes, I. K., Eriksen, H., & Bjørkvold, T. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102235
Pavlovičová, G., Gonda, D., Tirpáková, A., & Ďuriš, V. (2023) · European Journal of Contemporary Education · doi:10.13187/ejced.2023.3.962
KAIZENA: A TOOL FOR INDIVIDUALIZED AUDIO FEEDBACK ON ACADEMIC WRITING
Cherif, S. M., & Aufi, A. A. (2023) · Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes · doi:10.22190/jtesap230519035m
Clark, T. R. (2023) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2023.2283841
“…is understood as utilising dialogue to support learning, but being about ‘more than conversation’ (Yang and Carless 2013) and necessarily involving aspects of shared reasoning, relationships and responsibilities (Yang and Carless 2013; Winstone et al. 2017) to go ‘beyond feedback’ (Sadler 2010).”
InfluentialKusrin, K., & Supeno (2023) · Journal of English Education and Teaching · doi:10.33369/jeet.7.4.990-1008
Guo, M., & Yasin, M. (2023) · International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences · doi:10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i12/20354
Effects of Audio Feedback in an Online Assessment in Students’ Academic Motivation
Escultura, J. J., & Mejico, A. (2023) · Journal of Education Management and Development Studies · doi:10.52631/jemds.v3i3.72
Metadata
- Authors
- Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Surrey (GB)
- Aston University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Winstone, Naomi E.
- Venue
- Educational Psychologist
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-09-08
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-37
- ISSN
- 0046-1520 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6985
- OpenAlex
- W2417988078
- Cited by
- 884
- References
- 125
- Citations by year
- 2026: 186 · 2025: 118 · 2024: 106 · 2023: 124 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 14.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Educational Psychologist (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University) (submittedVersion)
- Own your potential (DEAKIN) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
- Keywords
- feedback, student engagement, feedback use, feedback interventions, student responsibility, feedback dialogue, metacognition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
