Cited by 366Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesSocial and Intergroup PsychologyPsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

Implicit and explicit evaluation: fMRI correlates of valence, emotional intensity, and control in the processing of attitudes

Cunningham, William A., Raye, Carol L., Johnson, Marcia K.·2004·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Previous work suggests that explicit and implicit evaluations (good-bad) involve somewhat different neural circuits that process different dimensions such as valence, emotional intensity, and complexity. To better understand these differences, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to identify brain regions that respond differentially to such dimensions depending on whether or not an explicit evaluation is required. Participants made either good-bad judgments (evaluative) or abstract-concrete judgments (not explicitly evaluative) about socially relevant concepts (e. g., ''murder,'' ''happiness,'' ''abortion,'' ''welfare''). After scanning, participants rated the concepts for goodness, badness, emotional intensity, and how much they tried to control their evaluation of the concept. Amygdala activation correlated with emotional intensity and right insula activation correlated with valence in both tasks, indicating that these aspects of stimuli were processed by these areas regardless of intention. In contrast, for the explicitly evaluative good-bad task only, activity in the anterior cingulate, frontal pole, and lateral areas of the orbital frontal cortex correlated with ratings of control, which in turn were correlated with a measure of ambivalence. These results highlight that evaluations are the consequence of complex circuits that vary depending on task demands.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/0898929042947919

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Black-White IAT has good psychometric properties and is linked to basic neural and affective processes relevant to implicit race bias.

    “The IAT is a dual-categorization task that has good psychometric properties (Cunningham, Preacher, & Banaji, 2001; Hofmann et al., 2005) and is linked to basic neural and affective processes relevant to implicit race bias (Cunningham, Raye, & Johnson, 2004; Phelps et al., 2000).”

    From Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention (2012) · cites this paper as Cunningham, Raye, & Johnson, 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cunningham, W. A., Raye, C. L., & Johnson, M. K.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2004-12-01
Volume
16
Issue
10
Pages
1717-1729
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2158557735
Cited by
366
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 30
FWCI
5.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH62196, P50MH062196)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Keywords
implicit evaluation, explicit evaluation, attitudes, valence, emotional intensity, ambivalence, amygdala, insula, anterior cingulate cortex, frontal pole, orbitofrontal cortex, social concepts
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Attitude, Brain, Brain Mapping, Emotions, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Judgment, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Reference Values, Social Perception, Temporal Lobe, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review