Cited by 145

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enhancing animal welfare by creating opportunities for positive affective engagement

Mellor, DJ·2015·New Zealand Veterinary Journal

Abstract

In line with an increasing emphasis on promoting positive welfare states in animals, this review extends previous accounts of how recent affective neuroscience observations may be used to identify and then to encourage animals to engage in reward-motivated behaviours. The terms affective states or affects are used to mean the subjective experiences, feelings or emotions that may motivate animals to behave in goal-directed ways and which may accompany success or failure to achieve those goals. These motivational affects may be positive, experienced as rewarding or pleasurable, or negative, experienced as aversive or punishing. There are two overall types: homeostasis-related negative affects that reflect an animal's internal physiological state, and situation-related positive or negative affects that reflect an animal's perception of its external circumstances. The major emphasis is on positive situation-related affects, in particular those that are potentially associated with exploration, feeding and animal-to-animal affiliative behaviours. The review introduces the new concept of positive affective engagement which represents the experience animals may have when they actively respond to motivations to engage in rewarding behaviours, and it incorporates all associated affects that are positive. For example, it would represent a state of engaged aliveness that may attend an animal's goal-directed, energised exploration of and interactions with a stimulus-rich environment. It a…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00480169.2014.926799

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. *Anonymous. Environmental enrichment. In: Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and Teaching. 3rd Edtn. Pp 30–44. Federation of Animal Science Societies, Champaign, USA, 2010
  2. 10.1016/0149-7634(95)00033-B · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/S0166-2236(03)00233-9 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.5016/1806-8774.2008.v10pT79 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.applanim.2010.05.001 · DOI
  6. 10.1159/000113276 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1002/bies.20280 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/B978-012532104-4/50006-8 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.03.002 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1038/79871 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/S0003-3472(83)80026-8 · DOI
  13. 10.1017/S0140525X00077104 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.010 · DOI
  15. *Dawkins MS. Why Animals Matter: Animal Consciousness, Animal Welfare, and Human Well-being. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2012
  16. *Fraser D. Understanding Animal Welfare: The Science in its Cultural Context. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 2008
  17. 10.1016/0168-1591(89)90051-8 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/00480169.2011.610283 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0003-3472(88)80110-6 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/S0165-0173(99)00023-5 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.009 · DOI
  22. *Knierim U, Carter CS, Fraser D, Gartner K, Lutgendorf KS, Mineka S, Panksepp J, Sachser N. Good welfare: Improving quality of life. In: Broom DM (ed). Coping with Challenge: Welfare in Animals including Humans. Pp 79–100. Dahlem Workshop Report 87. Dahlem University Press, Berlin, Germany, 2001
  23. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2006.06.028 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1079/9780851990040.0000 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.041 · DOI
  26. *Matthews LR. Behavioural deprivation: Are there substitutes for the real thing?. In: Appleby MC, Horrell RI, Petherick JC, Rutter SM (eds). Applied Animal Behaviour: Past, Present and Future. Pp 125–9. UFAW, Potters Bar, UK, 1991
  27. 10.1080/00480169.2011.619047 · DOI
  28. 10.1080/00480169.2014.926800 · DOI
  29. 10.1080/00480169.2014.926802 · DOI
  30. 10.1098/rspb.2010.0303 · DOI · Paper page
  31. *Numan M, Insel TR. The Neurobiology of Parental Behavior. Springer, New York, USA, 2003
  32. *Panksepp J. Rough-and-tumble play: A fundamental brain process. In: MacDonald KB (eds). Parents and Children Playing. Pp 147–84. SUNY Press, Albany, NY, USA, 1993
  33. 10.1093/oso/9780195096736.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1016/j.concog.2004.10.004 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2006.01.004 · DOI
  36. Panksepp J, Zellner MR. Towards a neurologically based unified theory of aggression. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale/International Review of Social Psychology 17, 37–61, 2004
  37. 10.1016/j.applanim.2010.09.014 · DOI
  38. 10.7551/mitpress/2502.001.0001 · DOI
  39. *Rolls ET. Emotion Explained. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2007
  40. Singer P. Animal Liberation. 2nd Edtn. Thorsons/Harper Collins Publishers: Hammersmith, London, UK, 1990
  41. 10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00204-5 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Watt D. Consciousness and emotion: Review of Jaak Panksepp's ‘Affective Neuroscience’. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6, 191–200, 1999
  43. 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.01.002 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01152-5 · DOI
  45. 10.1017/S0962728600031699 · DOI
  46. 10.1002/9780470751046 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 145

Metadata

Authors
Mellor, D.
Affiliations
Animal Welfare Science and Bioethics Centre, PN 452, Massey University
Venue
New Zealand Veterinary Journal
Published
2014-08-14
Volume
63
Issue
1
Pages
3-8
ISSN
  • 0048-0169
  • 1176-0710
Cited by
145
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review