The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antecedents to willingness to participate in a planned organizational change
Abstract
This field study examines factors contributing to employees’ openness to participate in a planned change within a national insurance company. Drawing from recent meta‐analyses indicating that both job characteristics (JCM) and social information processing (SIP) models contribute to job attitudes, a model of factors pertaining to the change is hypothesized and tested using path analytic methods. Results indicate employees receiving “quality” information about the change and having a high need for achievement viewed the change favorably. Contrary to expectations, employees’ anxiety about the change did not influence their attitude about change. These findings are discussed in light of JCM and SIP research and their implications for research on organizational change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076546 · Cited by 7,246
Employee reactions to job characteristics.
Hackman, J. R., & Lawler, E. E. (1971) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031152 · Cited by 2,442
Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations
Ven, A. H. V. D., Delbecq, A. L., & Koenig, R. (1976) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094477 · Cited by 1,979
COOPER, C. L., & MARSHALL, J. (1976) · Journal of Occupational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1976.tb00325.x · Cited by 1,201
A behaviorally-based measure of manifest needs in work settings
Steers, R. M., & Braunstein, D. N. (1976) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/0001-8791(76)90083-x · Cited by 510
Fear-Arousing Persuasive Messages
Boster, F. J., & Mongeau, P. (1984) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.1984.11678581 · Cited by 271
Cited by
A New Model of Work Role Performance: Positive Behavior in Uncertain and Interdependent Contexts
Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24634438 · Cited by 2,533
Change Readiness: A Multilevel Review
Rafferty, A. E., Jimmieson, N. L., & Armenakis, A. A. (2013) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206312457417 · Cited by 679
Uncertainty During Organizational Change: Types, Consequences, and Management Strategies
Bordia, P., Hobman, E., Jones, E., Gallois, C., & Callan, V. J. (2004) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1023/b:jobu.0000028449.99127.f7 · Cited by 665
Employees' attitudes toward organizational change: A literature review
Choi, M. (2011) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.20434 · Cited by 520
Familiarity breeds content: The impact of exposure to change on employee openness and well‐being
Axtell, C., Wall, T., Stride, C., Pepper, K., Clegg, C., Gardner, P., & Bolden, R. (2002) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/09631790260098596 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, V. D., Johnson, J. R., & Grau, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Communication Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1994-02
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 59-80
- ISSN
- 0090-9882 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-5752
- OpenAlex
- W2163564614
- Cited by
- 556
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 6.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antecedents to willingness to participate in a planned organizational change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00909889409365387
- The paper
- Miller, V. D., Johnson, J. R., & Grau, J. (1994). Antecedents to willingness to participate in a planned organizational change. Journal of Applied Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889409365387
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
